腹腔镜下结直肠癌根治术66例临床分析

李大勇; 方可

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

腹腔镜下结直肠癌根治术66例临床分析

李大勇 , 方可

文章导航 > 蚌埠医学院学报 > 2014, 39 > 8: (1074-1076)

引用本文:

Citation:

腹腔镜下结直肠癌根治术66例临床分析

李大勇,
方可

安徽省芜湖市第二人民医院普外胃肠外科, 241000

作者简介: 李大勇（1979-），男，主治医师.

中图分类号: R735.35

Clinical analysis of laparoscopic assisted radical resection for colorectal cancer

LI Da-yong,
FANG Ke

Department of General Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Wuhu, Wuhu Anhui 241000, China
CLC number: R735.35

摘要: 目的：比较腹腔镜下结直肠癌根治术与传统开腹手术围手术期的疗效与安全性，评价腹腔镜下结直肠癌根治术的可行性、安全性和肿瘤根治性。方法：回顾性分析腹腔镜下结直肠癌根治术（腹腔镜组）66例临床资料，包括手术相关指标、术后恢复指标、肿瘤根治性指标、术后并发症等情况，并与同期传统开腹手术（开腹组）95例进行比较。结果：腹腔镜组与开腹组的手术时间分别为（185.2±30.12）min和（121.3±20.45）min，术中出血量分别为（123.6±57.8）ml和（197.8±87.6）ml，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.01）。术后肠道排气时间：腹腔镜组为（2.87±0.25）d，开腹组为（3.52±0.19）d，差异有统计学意义（P<0.01）。2组术后并发症发生率差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；2组术后住院时间分别为（10.70±0.53）d和（13.97±0.28）d，腹腔镜组较开腹组明显缩短（P<0.01）。腹腔镜组清扫淋巴结个数明显少于开腹组（P<0.01），2组标本切缘阳性率差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。2组患者术后3年生存率差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论：与开腹手术相比，腹腔镜下结直肠癌根治术具有微创、出血少、患者术后疼痛减轻、胃肠功能恢复快、下床早等优势，同时能减少术后并发症及缩短术后住院时间，但手术时间长于开腹组。
- 结肠肿瘤 /
- 腹腔镜手术 /
- 开腹手术
Abstract: Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety between laparoscopic assisted radical resection and laparotomy for colorectal cancer for evaluating the feasibility,safety and oncological clearance of laparoscopic assisted radical resection.Methods: The clinical data(including operation index,postoperative recovery index,radical index and postoperative complication) of 66 patients treated with laparoscopic assisted radical resection and 95 patients treated with laparotomy were compared.Results: The operation time and intraoperative blood loss in laparoscopy and laparotomy group were(185.2±30.12) min &(121.3±20.45) min,and(123.6±57.8) ml &(197.8±87.6) ml,respectively,the differences of which were statistical significance(P<0.01).The postoperative anal exhaust time in laparoscopy and laparotomy group were(2.87±0.25) day and(3.52±0.19) day,the difference of which was statistical significance(P<0.01).The difference of the incidence of postoperative complication between two groups was not statistical significance(P>0.05).The postoperative hospitalization time of laparoscopy(10.70±0.53) days was significantly shorter than that of laparotomy group(13.97±0.28) days(P<0.01).The number of resecting lymph node in laparoscopy group were significantly less than that in laparotomy group(P<0.01).The differences of the positive rate of incisal edge and 3-year survival rate between two groups were not statistical significance(P>0.05).Conclusions: The laparoscopic assisted radical resection for colorectal cancer is minimally invasive,less blood loss,less pain,quick recovery of gastrointestinal function and early out-of-bed,which can decrease the postoperative complications and stay.
- colon neoplasms /
- laparoscopy /
- laparotomy

[1]	Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al.Randomized trial oflaparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma:3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group[J].J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25(2):3061-3068.
[2]	Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al.Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer(MRC CLASICC trial):multicentre, randomised controlled trial[J].Lancet, 2005, 365(1):1718-1726.
[3]	Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, et al.Short-term quality-of-lifeoutcomes following laparscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer:a randomized trial[J].JAMA, 2002, 287(3):321-328.
[4]	刘涛, 张超, 吕伟, 等.腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的进展和前景[J].国际外科学杂志, 2010, 37(3):182-184.
[5]	Zheng MH, Feng B, Hu CY, et al.Long-term outcome of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal cancer[J].Minim Invasive Ther Allied Techno, 2010, 19(6):329-339.
[6]	Sara S, Poncet G, Voirin D, et al.Can adequate lymphadenectomy be obtained by laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer Results of a case-control study in 200 patients[J].J Gastrointest Surg, 2010, 14(8):1244-1247.
[7]	The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy(COST) Study Group.A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer[J].N Engl J Med, 2004, 350(3):2050-2059.
[8]	王自强.手辅助腹腔镜手术在胃肠外科中的应用及适应证选择[J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2012, 15(8):796-798.
[9]	Siani LM, Ferranti F, Marzano M, et al.Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy:5-year oncology results[J].Chir Ital, 2009, 61(5/6):573-577.

[1]	曹海明 . 腹腔镜联合胆道镜与传统开腹手术治疗胆总管结石的临床疗效比较. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2020, 45(1): 71-73, 77. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2020.01.018
[2]	张敏 . 肺保护性通气联合肺复张对全麻开腹手术病人围手术期肺功能和氧分压的影响. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2019, 44(6): 738-741. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2019.06.011
[3]	吴国华 . 输卵管妊娠不同方法保留输卵管治疗的价值探讨. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2014, 38(4): 456-458.
[4]	朱忆晨 , 王才智 . 妇科腹腔镜手术中转开腹原因分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2021, 46(4): 509-511. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2021.04.021
[5]	唐洪海 , 谢方利 , 陈志刚 . 高龄结肠癌、直肠癌患者围手术期处理51例. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2004, 29(5): 447-448.
[6]	张孝龙 . 老年患者左半结肠癌合并梗阻手术治疗38例分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2011, 36(7): 724-725.
[7]	时荣 , 郑贤芳 , 葛小花 . 腹腔镜手术在卵巢囊肿剥除术中的应用价值分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2021, 46(11): 1568-1572. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2021.11.018
[8]	张夏怿 . 手术室护理路径在提高腹腔镜手术配合效率中的应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2020, 45(5): 682-684. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2020.05.033
[9]	陈亮 , 张军 , 何文胜 . 艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜手术病人疼痛介质与术后早期抑郁的影响. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2023, 48(5): 597-600. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2023.05.010
[10]	张剑宝 , 张碧红 , 庄哲宏 , 谭诗成 , 张冬辉 . 密封结肠灌洗在左半结肠癌并急性肠梗阻Ⅰ期切除吻合术中的应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2016, 41(12): 1626-1628. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2016.12.028
[11]	蒋圣战 , 高成绩 . 灌肠法在左半结肠癌急性梗阻术中的应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2007, 32(4): 462-463.
[12]	陈永侠 , 白茹 , 陈娜 , 王万霞 . 延续性护理对结肠癌根治术病人希望水平和生活质量的影响. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2019, 44(11): 1541-1544. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2019.11.029
[13]	王娟 , 王涛 , 王昌合 , 臧学利 , 赵强 . 腹腔镜手术应用喉罩时麻醉质量控制中术者积极参与的效果观察. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2016, 41(6): 736-738. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2016.06.010
[14]	宣冬生 , 郑立东 . TEE指导GDFT联合小剂量去甲肾上腺素用于老年腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的临床观察. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2019, 44(5): 585-589. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2019.05.006
[15]	吴超贤 , 张莉 . 颈动脉峰值流速变异率对择期行腹腔镜下手术老年病人容量反应性的评估价值. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2022, 47(4): 500-503. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2022.04.018
[16]	王扬州 , 蒋清华 , 张秀芹 . 腹腔镜下右半结肠癌实施D3根治术的临床疗效. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2015, 40(12): 1638-1640. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2015.12.007
[17]	李洪涛 , 陈勇 , 刘先富 , 张小静 , 郭伟 . 腹腔镜直肠癌直肠外翻拖出式Dixon手术的临床应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2013, 37(10): 1326-1327.
[18]	汤永蓉 , 王熙 , 周栩茹 . 腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术的临床疗效及其对病人激素指标和炎性因子水平影响. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2021, 46(1): 58-61. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2021.01.016
[19]	林奎生 , 陈斌 , 蒲斌 . 3种术式治疗胃十二指肠溃疡急性穿孔的比较. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2012, 36(12): 1468-1470.
[20]	杨玥 , 孔令锁 , 陈兰仁 . 反比通气对腹腔镜妇科病人气道压及围手术期PaCO₂的影响. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2018, 43(12): 1610-1613. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2018.12.020

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 3032
HTML全文浏览量: 298
PDF下载量: 3
被引次数: 0

腹腔镜下结直肠癌根治术66例临床分析

李大勇
方可

作者简介: 李大勇（1979-），男，主治医师.

安徽省芜湖市第二人民医院普外胃肠外科, 241000

收稿日期: 2014-04-30

关键词:

摘要: 目的：比较腹腔镜下结直肠癌根治术与传统开腹手术围手术期的疗效与安全性，评价腹腔镜下结直肠癌根治术的可行性、安全性和肿瘤根治性。方法：回顾性分析腹腔镜下结直肠癌根治术（腹腔镜组）66例临床资料，包括手术相关指标、术后恢复指标、肿瘤根治性指标、术后并发症等情况，并与同期传统开腹手术（开腹组）95例进行比较。结果：腹腔镜组与开腹组的手术时间分别为（185.2±30.12）min和（121.3±20.45）min，术中出血量分别为（123.6±57.8）ml和（197.8±87.6）ml，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.01）。术后肠道排气时间：腹腔镜组为（2.87±0.25）d，开腹组为（3.52±0.19）d，差异有统计学意义（P<0.01）。2组术后并发症发生率差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；2组术后住院时间分别为（10.70±0.53）d和（13.97±0.28）d，腹腔镜组较开腹组明显缩短（P<0.01）。腹腔镜组清扫淋巴结个数明显少于开腹组（P<0.01），2组标本切缘阳性率差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。2组患者术后3年生存率差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论：与开腹手术相比，腹腔镜下结直肠癌根治术具有微创、出血少、患者术后疼痛减轻、胃肠功能恢复快、下床早等优势，同时能减少术后并发症及缩短术后住院时间，但手术时间长于开腹组。

English Abstract

Clinical analysis of laparoscopic assisted radical resection for colorectal cancer

LI Da-yong
FANG Ke

Department of General Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Wuhu, Wuhu Anhui 241000, China

Received Date: 2014-04-30

Abstract: Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety between laparoscopic assisted radical resection and laparotomy for colorectal cancer for evaluating the feasibility,safety and oncological clearance of laparoscopic assisted radical resection.Methods: The clinical data(including operation index,postoperative recovery index,radical index and postoperative complication) of 66 patients treated with laparoscopic assisted radical resection and 95 patients treated with laparotomy were compared.Results: The operation time and intraoperative blood loss in laparoscopy and laparotomy group were(185.2±30.12) min &(121.3±20.45) min,and(123.6±57.8) ml &(197.8±87.6) ml,respectively,the differences of which were statistical significance(P<0.01).The postoperative anal exhaust time in laparoscopy and laparotomy group were(2.87±0.25) day and(3.52±0.19) day,the difference of which was statistical significance(P<0.01).The difference of the incidence of postoperative complication between two groups was not statistical significance(P>0.05).The postoperative hospitalization time of laparoscopy(10.70±0.53) days was significantly shorter than that of laparotomy group(13.97±0.28) days(P<0.01).The number of resecting lymph node in laparoscopy group were significantly less than that in laparotomy group(P<0.01).The differences of the positive rate of incisal edge and 3-year survival rate between two groups were not statistical significance(P>0.05).Conclusions: The laparoscopic assisted radical resection for colorectal cancer is minimally invasive,less blood loss,less pain,quick recovery of gastrointestinal function and early out-of-bed,which can decrease the postoperative complications and stay.