剖宫产术后再次妊娠分娩方式的选择

苏果; 张美玲; 张宁芝

doi:10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2015.08.026

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

剖宫产术后再次妊娠分娩方式的选择

苏果 , 张美玲 , 张宁芝

文章导航 > 蚌埠医学院学报 > 2015, 40 > 8: (1063-1066,1069)

引用本文:

Citation:

剖宫产术后再次妊娠分娩方式的选择

安徽省阜阳市人民医院妇产科, 236003

作者简介: 苏果(1982-),女,主治医师.

中图分类号: R714.4

The choice of delivery mode of secondary pregnancy after cesarean section

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The People's Hospital of Fuyang, Fuyang Anhui 236003, China
CLC number: R714.4

摘要: 目的:探讨剖宫产术后再次妊娠分娩方式的选择。方法:剖宫产术后再次妊娠晚期分娩孕妇614例为观察组,分4组:A组为剖宫产术后阴道分娩组;B组为具备阴道试产条件但选择重复剖宫产分娩组;C组为第二次剖宫产分娩组(包括B组);D组为第三次及四次剖宫产分娩组。选择无剖宫产史晚期分娩孕妇376例为对照组,分为2组:阴道分娩组(E组)和首次剖宫产组(F组)。将A组与B组,A组与E组,C、D组与F组配对比较,对母婴并发症、手术时间及住院时间等进行回顾性分析。结果:A组产后出血量和住院时间均明显少于B组(P<0.01),2组产褥病率及新生儿窒息率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组与E组产后出血量、产褥病率、住院时间、新生儿窒息率及阴道助产率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),A组会阴切开率较E组明显升高(P<0.01);C组、D组与F组产后出血量、产褥病率、住院时间及新生儿窒息率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),F组手术时间和盆腹腔粘连率均明显少于C组(P<0.01),C组和F组手术时间和盆腹腔粘连率亦显著小于D组(P<0.01)。结论:剖宫产术后再次妊娠,经过严格评估、筛选,对符合阴道分娩条件的孕妇实施阴道试产是安全的,与再次剖宫产相比可明显缩短住院时间,减少母婴并发症。
- 剖宫产术 /
- 妊娠 /
- 分娩
Abstract: Objective:To investigate the choice of delivery mode of secondary pregnancy after cesarean section.Methods:Six hundred and fourteen late pregnancy women with cesarean section were set as the observation group,and divided into group A(vaginal birth after cesarean section),group B(who could vaginal delivery,but choosing to cesarean section),group C(secondary cesarean delivery) and group D(third and fourth cesarean delivery).Three hundred and seventy-six late pregnancy women without cesarean section were set as the control group,and divided into group E(vaginal delivery) and group F(first cesarean delivery).The maternal and infant complications,operation time and hospital stay between group A and group B,between group A and group E,and between group C & group D and F group were analyzed.Results:The bleeding volume and time of hospitalization in group A after delivery were significantly less than that in group B(P<0.01).The differences of the rates of puerperal morbidity and neonatal asphyxia between group A and group B were not statistically significant(P>0.05).The differences of the postpartum bleeding volume,puerperal morbidity,time of hospitalization,neonatal asphyxia and rate of vaginal delivery between group A and group E were not statistically significant(P>0.05).The rate of perineal incision in group A was significantly higher than that in group E(P<0.01).The differences of the postpartum bleeding volume,puerperal morbidity,time of hospitalization and neonatal asphyxia between group C,group D and group E were not statistically significant(P>0.05).The operation time and abdominopelvic cavity adhesions rate in group F were significantly less than those in group C(P<0.01).The operation time and abdominopelvic cavity adhesions rate in group C and F were significantly less than those in group D(P<0.01).Conclusions:The vaginal trial production in the pregnant women with repregnance after cesarean section is safe according to the rigorous evaluation and selection,which can short hospitalization days and reduce maternal and infant complications.
- cesarean section /
- pregnance /
- delivery

[1]	阮焱,张为远.剖宫产的现状及剖宫产率高居不下的原因[J].实用妇产科杂志,2015,31(4):241-243.
[2]	应豪,段涛.剖宫产后再次妊娠的流行病学调查[J].实用妇产科杂志,2004,20(5):260-261.
[3]	余昕烊,漆洪波.剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道分娩相关问题[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2010,26(8):569-573.
[4]	Allornuvor GF,Xue M,Zhu X,et al.The definition,aetiology,presentation,diagnosis and management of previous caesarean scar defects[J].J Obstet Gynaecol,2013,33(8):759-763.
[5]	朱振萍,向思阳,王琳.瘢痕子宫再次妊娠严重并发症的危险因素及预防[J].浙江临床医学,2013,15(1):102-103.
[6]	周丽屏.重复剖宫产对孕产妇及新生儿的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2013,28(27):4550-4553.
[7]	Merrill BS,Gibbs CE.Planned vaginal delivery following cesare-an section[J].Obstet Gynecol,1978,52(1):50-52.
[8]	申恒春.剖宫产术后疤痕子宫再次妊娠93例分娩方式探讨[J].实用妇产科杂志,2013,29(3):234-236.
[9]	陈诚,常青,王琳.剖宫产术后再次妊娠分娩方式的探讨[J].实用妇产科杂志,2012,28(4):278-280.
[10]	吴景平,尚雅琼.186例瘢痕子宫妊娠后的分娩方式分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2014,29(8):1177-1179.
[11]	刘铭,刘丹,李婷.剖宫产术后阴道分娩管理规范对剖宫产术后阴道分娩的指导价值[J].中国围产医学杂志,2014,17(3):164-168.
[12]	黄平,刘国炳.一次剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道试产的临床处理[J].第一军医大学学报,2002,22(2):154-155.
[13]	陈敦金,何玉甜.剖宫产后再次阴道分娩[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2012,28(2):103-105.
[14]	Silver RM.Delivery after previous cesarean:long-term maternal outcomes[J].Semin Perinatol,2010,34(4):258-266.
[15]	李玲,于昕,郎景和.剖宫产术后再次妊娠子宫破裂10例临床分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2014,30(12):981-983.

[1]	方红 , 宋影 . 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠15例临床分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2013, 37(4): 438-439.
[2]	陈艳 , 曲皖君 , 胡卫平 , 陈玲 . 妊娠合并肺动脉高压的临床特征和母婴结局分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2019, 44(6): 725-728. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2019.06.007
[3]	张晶晶 , 何磊 , 王绍林 . 硬膜外镇痛分娩方式对初产妇妊娠结局的影响. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2021, 46(8): 1080-1082. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2021.08.023
[4]	蒋会芹 . 妊娠合并再生障碍性贫血行剖宫产手术1例. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2006, 31(4): 333-333.
[5]	李之珍 , 韩凌飞 , 胡晓武 . 孕妇血清中C反应蛋白与铜蓝蛋白水平的变化. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2013, 37(9): 1182-1183.
[6]	王剑南 . 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕处妊娠9例临床分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2008, 33(4): 463-464.
[7]	叶国柳 , 何玉 , 王玲玲 , 周玉 . 剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠相关影响因素分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2017, 42(5): 601-604. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2017.05.012
[8]	肖雯 , 王秀峰 . 妊娠合并精神障碍患者分娩方式探讨. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2014, 39(11): 1542-1544.
[9]	赵海华 . 首次剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道试产的可行性分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2017, 42(5): 661-663. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2017.05.031
[10]	陆丽 . 经腹羊膜腔灌注术治疗妊娠中期合并羊水过少的疗效评价及对围生儿结局的影响. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2017, 42(6): 778-780. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2017.06.026
[11]	丁彩云 . 重度妊娠高血压综合征67例临床分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2004, 29(5): 441-442.
[12]	范建灵 , 张宁芝 , 肖红 , 梅莉 , 苏果 . 早期子宫瘢痕妊娠5例临床分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2010, 35(3): 284-285.
[13]	陈云飞 , 董洪啟 , 丁力 , 李同海 , 姚守国 , 丰昕 . 单点穿刺法腰硬联合麻醉在剖宫产围术期的应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2007, 32(2): 164-165.
[14]	阚乃颖 , 年丽 . 剖宫产术中大出血的相关因素及防治. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2004, 29(6): 530-531.
[15]	罗玉珍 . 分娩球配合自由体位助产对孕产妇分娩时疼痛及分娩控制感的影响. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2015, 40(12): 1718-1720. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2015.12.038
[16]	陈磊 , 裴久炜 , 浦梅 , 刘羽 . 水中分娩98例临床分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2014, 38(5): 606-608.
[17]	王静敏 , 武璁 , 汪素坤 . 新旧产程标准对分娩的影响. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2016, 41(5): 603-604,607. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2016.05.015
[18]	杜长黄 , 贾桂芳 , 王道灵 . 左旋布比卡因与布比卡因腰麻在剖宫产术中的应用比较. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2009, 34(4): 336-337.
[19]	吴克刚 . 不同剂量布比卡因腰-硬联合麻醉用于剖宫产术90例效果观察. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2012, 36(9): 1105-1107.
[20]	赵丽 , 宫莹莹 , 梁彩侠 . 预见性护理对减少剖宫产术中并发症的效果观察. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2015, 40(12): 1740-1742. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2015.12.046

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 3734
HTML全文浏览量: 462
PDF下载量: 163
被引次数: 0

剖宫产术后再次妊娠分娩方式的选择

作者简介: 苏果(1982-),女,主治医师.

安徽省阜阳市人民医院妇产科, 236003

收稿日期: 2015-04-30

关键词:

剖宫产术 /
妊娠 /
分娩

摘要: 目的:探讨剖宫产术后再次妊娠分娩方式的选择。方法:剖宫产术后再次妊娠晚期分娩孕妇614例为观察组,分4组:A组为剖宫产术后阴道分娩组;B组为具备阴道试产条件但选择重复剖宫产分娩组;C组为第二次剖宫产分娩组(包括B组);D组为第三次及四次剖宫产分娩组。选择无剖宫产史晚期分娩孕妇376例为对照组,分为2组:阴道分娩组(E组)和首次剖宫产组(F组)。将A组与B组,A组与E组,C、D组与F组配对比较,对母婴并发症、手术时间及住院时间等进行回顾性分析。结果:A组产后出血量和住院时间均明显少于B组(P<0.01),2组产褥病率及新生儿窒息率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组与E组产后出血量、产褥病率、住院时间、新生儿窒息率及阴道助产率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),A组会阴切开率较E组明显升高(P<0.01);C组、D组与F组产后出血量、产褥病率、住院时间及新生儿窒息率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),F组手术时间和盆腹腔粘连率均明显少于C组(P<0.01),C组和F组手术时间和盆腹腔粘连率亦显著小于D组(P<0.01)。结论:剖宫产术后再次妊娠,经过严格评估、筛选,对符合阴道分娩条件的孕妇实施阴道试产是安全的,与再次剖宫产相比可明显缩短住院时间,减少母婴并发症。

English Abstract

The choice of delivery mode of secondary pregnancy after cesarean section

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The People's Hospital of Fuyang, Fuyang Anhui 236003, China

Received Date: 2015-04-30

Abstract: Objective:To investigate the choice of delivery mode of secondary pregnancy after cesarean section.Methods:Six hundred and fourteen late pregnancy women with cesarean section were set as the observation group,and divided into group A(vaginal birth after cesarean section),group B(who could vaginal delivery,but choosing to cesarean section),group C(secondary cesarean delivery) and group D(third and fourth cesarean delivery).Three hundred and seventy-six late pregnancy women without cesarean section were set as the control group,and divided into group E(vaginal delivery) and group F(first cesarean delivery).The maternal and infant complications,operation time and hospital stay between group A and group B,between group A and group E,and between group C & group D and F group were analyzed.Results:The bleeding volume and time of hospitalization in group A after delivery were significantly less than that in group B(P<0.01).The differences of the rates of puerperal morbidity and neonatal asphyxia between group A and group B were not statistically significant(P>0.05).The differences of the postpartum bleeding volume,puerperal morbidity,time of hospitalization,neonatal asphyxia and rate of vaginal delivery between group A and group E were not statistically significant(P>0.05).The rate of perineal incision in group A was significantly higher than that in group E(P<0.01).The differences of the postpartum bleeding volume,puerperal morbidity,time of hospitalization and neonatal asphyxia between group C,group D and group E were not statistically significant(P>0.05).The operation time and abdominopelvic cavity adhesions rate in group F were significantly less than those in group C(P<0.01).The operation time and abdominopelvic cavity adhesions rate in group C and F were significantly less than those in group D(P<0.01).Conclusions:The vaginal trial production in the pregnant women with repregnance after cesarean section is safe according to the rigorous evaluation and selection,which can short hospitalization days and reduce maternal and infant complications.