2种方法治疗高龄患者股骨粗隆间骨折手术的疗效比较

秦骥; 廖亮; 王开明

doi:10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2015.09.018

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

2种方法治疗高龄患者股骨粗隆间骨折手术的疗效比较

秦骥 , 廖亮 , 王开明

文章导航 > 蚌埠医学院学报 > 2015, 40 > 9: (1196-1198)

引用本文:

Citation:

2种方法治疗高龄患者股骨粗隆间骨折手术的疗效比较

安徽省蚌埠市第三人民医院骨科, 233000

作者简介: 秦骥(1969-),男,硕士,主治医师

中图分类号: R683

The curative effect comparision of two surgical technique in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of elderly patient

Department of Orthopaedics, The Third People's Hospital of Bengbu, Bengbu AnHui 233000, China
CLC number: R683

摘要: 目的:比较2种手术方法治疗高龄患者股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效。方法:股骨粗隆间骨折高龄患者(≥76岁)22例,分别采用切开复位内固定术(锁定解剖钢板或股骨近端髓内钉)(内固定组)和股骨头置换术(置换组)治疗各11例。比较2组患者术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间和卧床时间,随访骨折愈合时间及不良反应发生情况,按照Harris髋关节评分系统评价术后功能恢复情况,并计算各组优良率。结果:随访2组患者骨折均愈合。2组患者术中出血量和手术时间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),内固定组患者住院和卧床时间均长于置换组(P<0.05和P<0.01)。内固定组:优7例,良3例,可1例,差0例,优良率90.9%,置换组:优9例,良1例,可1例,差0例,优良率90.9%。结论:2种手术方法均可获得满意临床效果,应根据股骨粗隆间骨折稳定程度和患者身体状况选择恰当的手术方式。
- 股骨粗隆间骨折 /
- 高龄患者 /
- 内固定 /
- 髋假体
Abstract: Objective:To compare the curative effects of two surgical technique in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of elderly patient. Methods:Twenty-two elderly patients(age more than or equal to 76 years) with intertrochanteric fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation(locking anatomic plate or proximal femoral nail)(11 cases),and femoral head arthroplasty(11 cases).The intraoperative bleeding volume,operation time,hospitalization time and bed time,healing time of fracture and adverse reactions between two groups were compared.The postoperative functional recovery in all cases were evaluated using Harris Score system,the excellent and good rate of each group was calculated.Results:The femoral intertrochanteric fractures in 22 patients healed during the following period.The differences of intraoperative bleeding volume and operation time between two groups were not statistical significance(P>0.05).The hospitalization time and bed time in internal fixation group were longer than those in femoral head arthroplasty group(P<0.05 and P<0.01).Excellent in 7 cases,good in 3 cases,fair in 1 case and no error case in internal fixation group were found,the excellent and good rate of which was 90.9%.Excellent in 9 cases,good in 1 case and fair in 1 case in femoral head arthroplasty group were found,the excellent and good rate of which was 90.9%.Conclusions:The clinical effects of two treatment methods are good,surgical method is selected according to the stability degree of the femoral intertrochanteric fracture and condition of patients.
- femoral intertrochanteric fracture /
- elderly patient /
- internal fixation /
- arthroplasty

[1]	赵洪普,徐秋玉,曾勉东,等.老年股骨粗隆间骨折股骨近端锁定板与动力髋螺钉内固定治疗比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2011,19(10):793-796
[2]	雷金来,秦四清,裴琦,等.带大粗隆人工关节置换治疗高龄不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折132例[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2011,26(8):717-718.
[3]	罗狄鑫,孙鸿涛,陈为坚,等.闭合复位PFNA内固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折[J].实用骨科杂志,2012,18(1):76-78.
[4]	郑继会,胡思斌,苑娜,等.股骨近端抗旋髓内钉固定结合骨水泥注入治疗股骨粗隆间转移癌性病理性骨折[J].创伤外科杂志,2013,15(2):123-125.
[5]	赵有春,邓仲元,彭军,等.改良锁定加压接骨板治疗股骨粗隆间EvansⅣ型骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2013,28(S1):15-17.
[6]	庞向华,欧兆阳强,欧建江,等.半髋关节置换与防旋型股骨近端髓内钉治疗高龄不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效对比[J].重庆医学,2013,42(10):1086-1088.
[7]	Abdelkhalek M,Ali AM,Abdelwahab M,et al.Cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty with a cerclage cable technique for unstable intertrochanterichip fractures in elderly patients[J].Eur J Orthop Surg Traumato,2013,23(4):443-448.
[8]	Pui CM,Bostrom MP,Westrich GH,et al.Increased complication rate following conversion total hip arthroplasty after cephalomedullary fixation for intertrochanteric hip fractures:a multi-center study[J].J Arthroplasty,2013,28(8):45-47.
[9]	Pachore JA,Shah VI,Sheth AN,et al.Hip arthroplasty in failed intertrochanteric fractures in elderly[J].J Orthop,2013,47(6):572-577.
[10]	张建东,张天东,陶若奇.人工髋关节置换治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效观察[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2012,18(8):738-739.

[1]	陈瑞玲 , 袁培培 , 蒋萍 . 股骨近端带锁髓内钉内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的术中护理. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2009, 34(12): 1140-1141.
[2]	马炜 , 李一凡 , 潘檀 , 李学军 , 李立 , 干阜生 . 侧卧位和仰卧位PFNA治疗超高龄股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2016, 41(9): 1188-1190,1193. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2016.09.022
[3]	张胜友 , 曹建明 , 梁启楼 , 李建飞 . 防旋型股骨近端髓内钉固定治疗不稳定性股骨粗隆间骨折29例. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2012, 36(3): 325-327.
[4]	陈建文 . 骨折治疗与运动康复一体化模式对股骨粗隆间骨折病人运动功能恢复的影响. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2017, 42(9): 1196-1198,1203. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2017.09.013
[5]	杜峰 , 侯辉宝 , 程树银 . 不同内固定方法治疗股骨远端骨折的疗效分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2016, 41(2): 200-201,204. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2016.02.020
[6]	赵庆华 , 刘其明 , 王予治 , 孙羽 , 孙保安 . 钛缆结合髌骨爪内固定治疗髌骨粉碎性骨折23例. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2013, 37(6): 716-717.
[7]	雷丙俊 , 牛国旗 . 过伸复位与经椎弓根椎体内植骨短节段内固定治疗胸腰椎压缩性骨折15例. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2012, 36(11): 1303-1304.
[8]	赵纲驿 . 锁定钢板内固定联合玻璃酸钠对胫骨平台骨折术后膝关节功能及综合应激状态的影响. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2019, 44(11): 1500-1504. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2019.11.018
[9]	周忠锋 , 陈炳前 , 魏东 , 李高玉 . 外固定架加有限内固定治疗老年不稳定桡骨远端骨折36例. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2012, 36(12): 1486-1488.
[10]	李四波 , 顾小华 , 洪潮 , 陆海建 , 陈晓春 . 短节段椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗单节段胸腰段爆裂骨折的远期疗效分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2016, 41(2): 169-172. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2016.02.010
[11]	王玉龙 , 张媛媛 , 范宇 , 王庆海 . 针刺联合康复训练对髁状突骨折术后患者治疗效果观察. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2016, 41(8): 1074-1075,1078. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2016.08.032
[12]	朱孝勇 , 郑治 , 杨科 . 两种PFNA锁定技术在股骨粗隆间骨折中的疗效比较. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2023, 48(9): 1254-1257. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2023.09.017
[13]	张宝 . 股骨近端解剖型锁定钢板治疗老年EvanⅢ、Ⅳ型股骨粗隆间骨折疗效分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2016, 41(2): 224-226. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2016.02.029
[14]	赵刚 . Gamma钉微创治疗股骨粗隆间骨折156例疗效分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2011, 36(3): 281-282.
[15]	何阳 , 邵松 . 微创手术治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的手术时机分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2020, 45(2): 188-191. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2020.02.014
[16]	李士敏 , 陈双凤 , 倪路阳 , 王玲 , 张世东 . 微视频与微信健康教育对股骨粗隆间骨折围手术期护理质量的影响. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2020, 45(8): 1129-1131. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2020.08.038
[17]	张杰 , 石兴雷 , 阮传江 , 韩玉虎 , 徐磊 , 范虎 . 股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗Seinsheimer Ⅴ型股骨转子下骨折的体会. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2016, 41(11): 1446-1449. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2016.11.012
[18]	李立 , 崔西龙 , 王宏亮 , 刘朝宇 , 郭标 , 潘檀 , 干阜生 . 空心加压螺钉结合支撑钢板治疗Hoffa骨折. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2015, 40(3): 359-361. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2015.03.021
[19]	杨晓松 , 王刚 , 高峰 . 镍钛记忆合金环抱器治疗多发性肋骨骨折34例. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2012, 36(10): 1213-1214.
[20]	李虎 , 黄洪 , 储辉 . 闭合复位交锁髓内钉治疗胫骨干骨折36例临床体会. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2013, 37(11): 1456-1457.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 3995
HTML全文浏览量: 496
PDF下载量: 466
被引次数: 0

2种方法治疗高龄患者股骨粗隆间骨折手术的疗效比较

作者简介: 秦骥(1969-),男,硕士,主治医师

安徽省蚌埠市第三人民医院骨科, 233000

收稿日期: 2015-02-24

关键词:

摘要: 目的:比较2种手术方法治疗高龄患者股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效。方法:股骨粗隆间骨折高龄患者(≥76岁)22例,分别采用切开复位内固定术(锁定解剖钢板或股骨近端髓内钉)(内固定组)和股骨头置换术(置换组)治疗各11例。比较2组患者术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间和卧床时间,随访骨折愈合时间及不良反应发生情况,按照Harris髋关节评分系统评价术后功能恢复情况,并计算各组优良率。结果:随访2组患者骨折均愈合。2组患者术中出血量和手术时间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),内固定组患者住院和卧床时间均长于置换组(P<0.05和P<0.01)。内固定组:优7例,良3例,可1例,差0例,优良率90.9%,置换组:优9例,良1例,可1例,差0例,优良率90.9%。结论:2种手术方法均可获得满意临床效果,应根据股骨粗隆间骨折稳定程度和患者身体状况选择恰当的手术方式。

English Abstract

The curative effect comparision of two surgical technique in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of elderly patient

Department of Orthopaedics, The Third People's Hospital of Bengbu, Bengbu AnHui 233000, China

Received Date: 2015-02-24

Abstract: Objective:To compare the curative effects of two surgical technique in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of elderly patient. Methods:Twenty-two elderly patients(age more than or equal to 76 years) with intertrochanteric fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation(locking anatomic plate or proximal femoral nail)(11 cases),and femoral head arthroplasty(11 cases).The intraoperative bleeding volume,operation time,hospitalization time and bed time,healing time of fracture and adverse reactions between two groups were compared.The postoperative functional recovery in all cases were evaluated using Harris Score system,the excellent and good rate of each group was calculated.Results:The femoral intertrochanteric fractures in 22 patients healed during the following period.The differences of intraoperative bleeding volume and operation time between two groups were not statistical significance(P>0.05).The hospitalization time and bed time in internal fixation group were longer than those in femoral head arthroplasty group(P<0.05 and P<0.01).Excellent in 7 cases,good in 3 cases,fair in 1 case and no error case in internal fixation group were found,the excellent and good rate of which was 90.9%.Excellent in 9 cases,good in 1 case and fair in 1 case in femoral head arthroplasty group were found,the excellent and good rate of which was 90.9%.Conclusions:The clinical effects of two treatment methods are good,surgical method is selected according to the stability degree of the femoral intertrochanteric fracture and condition of patients.