磁敏感加权成像对脑微出血与高血压关系的研究
Application of SWI in the analysis of the relationship between cerebral micorbleeds and hypertension
-
摘要: 目的:探讨不同分型的脑微出血(cerebral microbleeds,CMBs)与高血压的关系。方法:回顾分析931例行颅脑磁共振检查的患者。其中高血压患者220例,非高血压患者711例。所有病例均加扫磁敏感加权成像序列。结果:Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型、Ⅴ型CMBs在高血压组与非高血压组的检出率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05~P<0.01),Ⅲ型、Ⅳ型CMBs在高血压组与非高血压组的检出率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);高血压组与非高血压组不同分型的CMBs构成比差异无统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:CMBs多见于高血压患者;Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型、Ⅴ型CMBs多见于高血压患者,Ⅲ型、Ⅳ型CMBs在高血压与非高血压患者的检出率差别不大;高血压患者CMBs以Ⅰ型为主,Ⅴ型次之;非高血压患者Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型CMBs偏多。Abstract: Objective: To analyze the relationship between different types of cerebral microbleeds(CMBs) and hypertension. Methods: The data of cerebral susceptibility weighted imaging in 931 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Two hundred and twenty cases with hypertension and 711 cases without hypertension were identified. All patients were additionally scanned using susceptibility weighted imaging. Results: The differences of the detection rate of type Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅴ CMBs between the hypertension group and non-hypertension group were statistically significant(P<0.05~P<0.01). The differences of the detection rate of type Ⅲ and Ⅳ CMBs between the hypertension group and non-hypertension group were not statistically significant(P>0.05). The differences of the constituent ratios of different types of CMBs between the hypertension group and non-hypertension group were not statistically significant(P>0.05). Conclusions: CMBs is more common in patients with hypertension, type Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅴ CMBs are more common in patients with hypertension, and the differences of the detection rate of type Ⅲ and Ⅳ CMBs between the hypertension group and non-hypertension group is small. TypeⅠCMBs in hypertensive patients is mainly, followed by type Ⅴ, and typeⅠand typeⅡ CMBs are more in non-hypertensive patients.
-
Key words:
- susceptibility weighted imaging /
- cerebral microbleed /
- hypertension
-
[1] 蒋小群,郝子龙,王秋筱,等.脑出血患者出血部位与病因构成的相关性研究[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2013,10(5):259. [2] 张玉东,侯键,廖华强,等.SWI及DWI对高血压颅内微出血的检测价值[J].中国中西医结合影像学杂志,2014,12(1):18. [3] 陈平友,陈学强,杜恩甫,等.MRI在脑血管淀粉样变脑出血诊断中的应用[J].实用放射学杂志,2011,27(12):1807. [4] GREENBERG SM,NANDIGAM RN,DELGADO P,et al.Microbleeds versus macrobleeds:evidence for distinct entities[J].Stroke,2009,40(7):2382. [5] 杨昂,张雪林.磁敏感加权成像相位图对脑内顺磁性物质与逆磁性物质的鉴别诊断[J].中华放射学杂志,2009,43(6):590. [6] GREENBERG SM,VERNOOIJ MW,CORDONNIER C,et al.Cerebral microbleeds:a guide to detection and interpretation[J].Lancet Neurol,2009,8(2):165. [7] FAZEKAS F,KLEINERT R,ROOB G.et al.Histopathologic analysis of foci of signal loss on gradient-echo T2*-weighted MR images in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage:evidence of microangiopathy-related microbleeds[J].AJNR,1999,20(4):637. [8] JEONG SW,JUNG KH,CHU K,et al.Clinical and radiologic differences between primary intracerebral hemorrhage with and without microbleeds on gradient- echo magnetic resonance images[J].Arch Neurol,2004,61(6):905. [9] ROOB G,FAZEKAS F.Magnetic resonance imaging of cerebral microbleeds[J].Curr Opin Neurol,2000,13(1):69. [10] 张楚楚,孙永安,程欣欣,等.磁敏感成像对脑淀粉样血管病导致脑出血的诊断价值探讨[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2013,15(12):1253. [11] 黄楠,曹代荣,张宇阳.3.0T磁共振SWI序列对脑淀粉样血管病的诊断价值[J].临床放射学杂志,2014,33(6):828. [12] CHEN YF,CHANG YY,LIU JS,et al.Association between cerebral microbleeds and prior primary intracerebral hemorrhage in ischemic storke patients[J].Clin Neurol Neurosurg,2008,110(10):988. [13] POELS MM,VERNOOIJ MW,IKRAM MA,et al.Prevalence and risk factors of cerebral microbleeds:an update of the Rotterdam scan study[J].Stroke,2010,41(Suppl 10):S103. [14] 何金龙,牛广明,韩晓东,等.SWI在糖尿病患者伴发脑内微出血中的诊断应用[J].放射学实践,2013,28(12):1254. [15] 张丽雅,朱平,李华丽,等.SWI在脑微出血与急性期脑梗死后出血转化的相关性研究[J].临床放射学杂志,2012,31(7):918. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 3679
- HTML全文浏览量: 396
- PDF下载量: 519
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
