阴式子宫瘢痕妊娠病灶切除+子宫憩室修补术与子宫动脉栓塞术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的疗效比较
Effect comparison between transvaginal resection combined with uterine diverticulum neoplasty and uterine artery embolization in the treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy
-
摘要: 目的:比较阴式子宫瘢痕妊娠病灶切除+子宫憩室修补术与子宫动脉栓塞术对治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(caesarean scar pregnancy,CSP)的疗效。方法:回顾性分析30例CSP患者临床资料,12例行经阴式子宫瘢痕妊娠病灶切除+子宫憩室修补术,18例行子宫动脉栓塞术联合甲氨蝶呤治疗+择期清宫术。比较2种术式的手术时间、术中出血量、术后血β-hCG恢复正常的时间、住院时间、住院费用及并发症的发生情况。结果:2种术式手术时间和住院时间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。12例经阴道子宫下段切开取胚术均手术成功,无明显并发症,术中出血量为 (55.2±15.5)mL,血β-hCG恢复正常时间为(15.8±3.5)d,住院费用为(7 820.5±360.0)元,均明显少于子宫动脉栓塞术各指标(P<0.01)。18例子宫动脉栓塞术中有1例在术后进行清宫术,术中出现瘢痕破裂,急诊行经腹子宫瘢痕妊娠病灶切除及修补。结论:阴式子宫瘢痕妊娠病灶切除+子宫憩室修补术作为治疗CSP的手术方案,是一种损伤小、恢复快、有效、安全、经济的手术方法。Abstract: Objective: To compare the effects of transvaginal resection combined with uterine diverticulum neoplasty and uterine artery embolization in the treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy(CSP).Methods: The data of 30 patients with CSP were retrospectively analyzed.Twelve cases were treated with transvaginal resection combined with uterine diverticulum neoplasty,18 cases were treated with uterine artery embolization,methotrexate combined with curettage.The operative time,peroperative bleeding volume,postoperative recovery time of β-hCG,hospitalization time and cost,and complication between two techniques were compared.Results: The differences of the average operation and hospitalization time were not statistically significant(P>0.05).The taking embryo operation through transvaginal resection of lower uterine segment in 12 cases were successful,and no complication was found.The peroperative bleeding volume,postoperative recovery time of β-hCG,hospitalization cost were(55.2±15.5)mL,(15.8±3.5)d and(7 820.5±360.0) Yuan,respectively,which were less than those in the patients treated with uterine artery embolization(P<0.01).Among 18 cases treated with uterine artery embolization,1 case was treated with curettage.The scar broke during the operation,and which was excised and repaired.Conclusions: The treatment of CSP with the transvaginal resection combined with uterine diverticulum neoplasty is effective,safe,economic and quick recovery.
-
[1] 孙秋蕾,颜苹.彩色多普勒超声诊断子宫切口妊娠的临床价值[J].临床超声医学杂志,2013,15(3):208. [2] 任彤,赵俊,万希润.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的诊断及处理[J].现代妇产科进展,2007,16(6):433. [3] 曾兆君,吴大保.阴式子宫切口瘢痕妊娠病灶清除术在剖宫产切口瘢痕妊娠中的应用[J].安徽医药,2014,18(10):1949. [4] 洪澜,杨舒盈,贺国丽.经阴式组织清除术治疗子宫瘢痕妊娠的价值[J].海南医学,2015,26(5):735. [5] 张英.剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕部位妊娠96例临床分析[J].中华妇产科杂志,2010,45(9):664. [6] OFILI-YEBOVI D,BEN-NAGI J,SAWYER E.Deficient lower-segement cesarean section scars:prevalence and risk factors [J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2008,31(1):72. [7] 刘静华,范义,何学森.经阴道彩色多普勒超声评价子宫动脉栓塞术对子宫瘢痕妊娠的治疗效果[J].中国介入影像与治疗学,2010,7(3):278. [8] 白浩,黄丹萍,李姣玲.彩色多酱勒超声诊断及治疗子宫瘢痕妊娠[J].中国医学影像技术,2010,26(1):113. [9] 孟琳.剖宫产子宫切口早期妊娠绒毛植入的诊治[J].实用预防医学,2005,12(4):914. [10] KIRKE M,BOURNE T.Diagnosis of epctopic pregnancy with ultrasound[J].Best Pract Res Clin obstet Gynaecol,2009,23(4):501. [11] 闻酤,刘晓瑷.剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠的诊疗进展[J].生殖与避孕,2008,28(4):236. [12] 罗萍.甲氨蝶呤治疗剖宫产术后子宫切口妊娠疗效观察[J].实用预防医学,2011,18(1):111. [13] WANG JH,XU KJ,XU JY,et al.Methotrexate therapy for cesarean section scar pregnancy with and without section curettage[J].Fertil Steril,2009,92(4):1208. [14] 袁冬娟.腹腔镜下瘢痕修补术治疗剖宫产后子宫瘢痕部位妊娠[J].中国冶金工业医学杂志,2015,32(1):79. [15] Deans R,Abbott J.Hysteroscopic management of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy[J].Fertil Steril,2010,93(6):1735. [16] 郭银树,段华,张颖,等.宫腔镜联合B超及腹腔镜在剖宫产切口憩室诊治中的应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2011,11(11):1019. [17] 张娟.子宫动脉栓塞联合刮宫术治疗子宫切口妊娠的疗效评价[J].实用临床医药杂志,2013,17(19):165. [18] 王玉,孟凡,李坚,等.子宫动脉化疗栓塞术结合腹腔镜监测下清宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠[J].中国医学影像技术,2010,26(12):2354. [19] 单莉莉,乐爱文,肖天慧,等.经阴道子宫下段切开取胚与子宫动脉栓塞术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的比较性研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2013,13(7):611.
计量
- 文章访问数: 6121
- HTML全文浏览量: 526
- PDF下载量: 126
- 被引次数: 0