鼻中隔穿孔不同修补术的临床效果对比分析

路鹏; 徐西红; 杨利; 董世涛; 于天南; 崔晓光

doi:10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2017.03.016

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

鼻中隔穿孔不同修补术的临床效果对比分析

路鹏 , 徐西红 , 杨利 , 董世涛 , 于天南 , 崔晓光

文章导航 > 蚌埠医学院学报 > 2017, 42 > 3: (335-339)

引用本文:

Citation:

鼻中隔穿孔不同修补术的临床效果对比分析

河北省承德市口腔医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 067000

作者简介: 路鹏(1981-),男,硕士,主治医师.

中图分类号: R765.34

Comparative analysis of the clinical effects between different repairs in nasal septum perforation

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Neck Surgery, Chengde Stomatological Hospital, Chengde Hebei 067000, China
CLC number: R765.34

摘要: 目的：比较3种不同鼻中隔穿孔修补术式的临床治疗效果及鼻腔通气功能变化。方法：选取鼻中隔穿孔病人54例，按照术式不同分为自体颞筋膜筛骨垂直板夹层法组（A组）、自体带蒂鼻腔底黏骨膜瓣修补法组（B组）及单蒂黏骨膜或软骨膜瓣翻转联合游离颞肌筋膜瓣修补法组（C组），观察3组手术治疗效果及术后鼻腔通气功能。结果：B组术中出血量、手术时间均少于A、C组（P<0.05~P<0.01），B、C组损伤黏膜面积、创面愈合时间均显著优于A组（P<0.01），C组在创面愈合时间亦优于B组（P<0.05），而3组愈合分期差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；B、C组术后3个月VAS评分均显著低于A组（P<0.05），C组术后3个月及术后1年鼻腔最小截面积均显著高于A、B组（P<0.05~P<0.01）。结论：单蒂黏骨膜或软骨膜瓣翻转联合游离颞肌筋膜瓣修补法治疗鼻中隔穿孔在疗效及改善鼻腔通气功能方面均优于自体颞筋膜筛骨垂直板夹层法和自体带蒂鼻腔底黏骨膜瓣修补法。
- 鼻中隔穿孔 /
- 修补术 /
- 鼻腔通气功能
Abstract: Objective:To observe the clinical effects between three kinds of repairs of nasal septum perforation and nasal ventilation function change.Methods:Fifty-four patients with nasal septum perforation were divided into A,B and C groups.The A,B and C groups were treated with autologous temporal fascia and perpendicular plate of ethmoid bone sandwich technique,autograft with pedicle nasal mucoperiosteal flap repair method,and single pedicle sticky periosteum or perichondrium flip flap combined with free temporalis myofascial flap repair method,respectively.The treatment effects and postoperative nasal ventilation function in three groups were observed.Results:The intraoperative blood loss and operation time in group B were significantly lower than those in A and C groups(P<0.05 to P<0.01).The mucosal injury area and wound healing time in B and C groups were significantly better than those in group A(P<0.05).The wound healing time in group C was shorter than that in group B(P<0.05),and the differences of the healing stage between the three groups were not statistically significant(P>0.05).The minimal cross-sectional area of nasal cavity in group C at postoperative 3 months and 1 year were significantly higher than that in A and B groups.Conclusions:The clinical effect of the single pedicle sticky periosteum or perichondrium flip flap combined with free temporal fascia flap repair method in the treatment of nasal septum perforation is good,which in improving the nasal ventilation function is better than that in autologous temporal fascia and perpendicular plate of ethmoid bone sandwich technique,and autograft with pedicle nasal mucoperiosteal flap repair method.
- nasal septum perforation /
- repair /
- nasal ventilation function

[1]	GIACOMINI PG,FERRARO S, DI GIROLAMO S, et al. Large nasal septal perforation repair by closed endoscopically assisted approach[J]. Ann Plast Surg,2011,66(6):633.
[2]	LI L,HAN D,ZHANG L,et al. Impact of nasal septal perforations of varying sizes and locations on the warming function of thenasal cavity:A computational fluid-dynamics analysis of 5 cases[J]. Ear Nose Throat J,2016,95(9):E9.
[3]	KIM SW, RHEE CS. Nasal septal perforation repair:predictive factors and systematic review of the literature[J]. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2012,20(1):58.
[4]	沈莉. 鼻内镜下鼻中隔矫正合并下鼻甲骨折外移术改善鼻腔通气的临床疗效[J]. 江苏医药,2016,42(19):2178
[5]	高增斌,马敬,徐学海,等. 鼻中隔软骨翻瓣法加鼻甲粘膜修补鼻中隔穿孔[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2002,16(5):241.
[6]	SHARMA A,JANUS J,DIGGELMANN HR,et al. Healing septal perforations by secondary intention using acellular dermis as a bioscaffold[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol,2015,124(6):425.
[7]	朱先柏,霍宇,刘英祥,等. 鼻内镜下行鼻中隔穿孔修补术的技巧与难点分析[J]. 重庆医学,2014,43(20):2647.
[8]	麻宁,陈付华,唐春霞. 自体颞筋膜筛骨垂直板夹层法修补鼻中隔穿孔[J]. 四川医学,2012,35(2):265.
[9]	倪伟鹏,吴梁江,陈振清. 鼻内窥镜下带蒂鼻腔底黏骨膜瓣修补鼻中隔穿孔例[J]. 广东医学院学报,2013,31(4):416.
[10]	尹兴红,胡伟,张新海,等. 带蒂鼻中隔-鼻腔底黏骨膜瓣和颞肌筋膜瓣修补鼻中隔穿孔[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头经外科杂志,2014,28(20):1605.
[11]	张天振,张庆泉,姜邵红. 鼻中隔穿孔病人手术前后鼻腔通气功能的变化[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2011,17(5):344.

[1]	马静 , 刘士会 , 李季 . 不留置胃肠减压管并早期进食在上消化道穿孔修补术中的应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2011, 36(7): 726-728.
[2]	林奎生 , 陈斌 , 蒲斌 . 3种术式治疗胃十二指肠溃疡急性穿孔的比较. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2012, 36(12): 1468-1470.
[3]	张文革 , 张辉 , 王锋 . 腹腔镜胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补36例临床观察. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2011, 36(11): 1206-1207.
[4]	高光荣 . 复合平塞补片无张力修补腹股沟疝30例. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2010, 35(1): 59-60.
[5]	孙本路 , 舒继红 . 鼻内镜下三线减张法鼻中隔成形术治疗鼻中隔偏曲46例疗效分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2010, 35(8): 784-785.
[6]	张舒龙 , 朱勇 . 腹腔镜胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术临床疗效分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2014, 38(1): 83-85.
[7]	尹俊 , 夏菁 , 况勇 , 孙本路 , 仝心源 , 林凌 . 下鼻甲外移术在鼻中隔偏曲手术中的应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2014, 38(6): 724-725.
[8]	白咏 , 陈涛 , 薛光 , 张子焕 , 蒋晓帆 , 齐一龙 . 数字化成形钛网颅骨修补术的手术技巧探讨. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2017, 42(10): 1327-1329. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2017.10.010
[9]	姚荣英 , 顾璇 , 郑玲 . 瘦素抵抗肥胖雌性大鼠肺通气功能的损伤研究. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2011, 36(11): 1181-1183.
[10]	李成华 , 庄严 , 沈铁骁 . 疝环填充式无张力腹股沟疝修补术58例临床分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2004, 29(2): 165-166.
[11]	屈晓洁 , 侯琴 . 自体组织“桥”式修补术治疗阴道后壁脱垂效果探讨. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2010, 35(5): 501-502.
[12]	朱畅 , 郭春华 , 刘嘉林 , 夏利刚 . 超声刀在完全腹膜外疝修补术中的临床应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2011, 36(7): 707-708,711.
[13]	刘丽 , 张素琴 , 张莉华 . 先天性腭裂修补术126例护理体会. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2006, 31(4): 432-433.
[14]	王东 . 腹腔镜疝修补术对不同直径腹股沟疝的治疗效果. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2013, 37(9): 1168-1170.
[15]	陈传国 , 杨卫富 , 戴象君 . 善释补片在腹膜前股疝无张力修补术中的应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2013, 37(4): 436-437.
[16]	张俊华 , 吴国富 , 贺志刚 , 樊逸隽 . 精确神经阻滞麻醉下行无张力腹股沟疝修补术38例. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2013, 37(7): 863-864.
[17]	李华文 , 魏福美 . 鼻内镜下微创治疗鼻中隔偏曲伴下鼻甲肥大. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2007, 32(2): 200-201.
[18]	张玉梅 . 充填式无张力疝修补术72例围手术期护理体会. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2010, 35(9): 965-966.
[19]	李小军 , 吕宏安 , 刘学刚 , 唐震 , 王祖义 , 刘以尧 , 段贵新 , 汪国文 . Hybrid手术在中央型房间隔缺损修补术中的应用价值. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2012, 36(5): 535-536,538.
[20]	胡霜久 , 查润生 . 疝环填充式无张力疝修补术在老年腹股沟疝中的应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2008, 33(3): 319-321.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 4255
HTML全文浏览量: 499
PDF下载量: 84
被引次数: 0

鼻中隔穿孔不同修补术的临床效果对比分析

作者简介: 路鹏(1981-),男,硕士,主治医师.

河北省承德市口腔医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 067000

收稿日期: 2016-02-21

关键词:

摘要: 目的：比较3种不同鼻中隔穿孔修补术式的临床治疗效果及鼻腔通气功能变化。方法：选取鼻中隔穿孔病人54例，按照术式不同分为自体颞筋膜筛骨垂直板夹层法组（A组）、自体带蒂鼻腔底黏骨膜瓣修补法组（B组）及单蒂黏骨膜或软骨膜瓣翻转联合游离颞肌筋膜瓣修补法组（C组），观察3组手术治疗效果及术后鼻腔通气功能。结果：B组术中出血量、手术时间均少于A、C组（P<0.05~P<0.01），B、C组损伤黏膜面积、创面愈合时间均显著优于A组（P<0.01），C组在创面愈合时间亦优于B组（P<0.05），而3组愈合分期差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；B、C组术后3个月VAS评分均显著低于A组（P<0.05），C组术后3个月及术后1年鼻腔最小截面积均显著高于A、B组（P<0.05~P<0.01）。结论：单蒂黏骨膜或软骨膜瓣翻转联合游离颞肌筋膜瓣修补法治疗鼻中隔穿孔在疗效及改善鼻腔通气功能方面均优于自体颞筋膜筛骨垂直板夹层法和自体带蒂鼻腔底黏骨膜瓣修补法。

English Abstract

Comparative analysis of the clinical effects between different repairs in nasal septum perforation

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Neck Surgery, Chengde Stomatological Hospital, Chengde Hebei 067000, China

Received Date: 2016-02-21

Abstract: Objective:To observe the clinical effects between three kinds of repairs of nasal septum perforation and nasal ventilation function change.Methods:Fifty-four patients with nasal septum perforation were divided into A,B and C groups.The A,B and C groups were treated with autologous temporal fascia and perpendicular plate of ethmoid bone sandwich technique,autograft with pedicle nasal mucoperiosteal flap repair method,and single pedicle sticky periosteum or perichondrium flip flap combined with free temporalis myofascial flap repair method,respectively.The treatment effects and postoperative nasal ventilation function in three groups were observed.Results:The intraoperative blood loss and operation time in group B were significantly lower than those in A and C groups(P<0.05 to P<0.01).The mucosal injury area and wound healing time in B and C groups were significantly better than those in group A(P<0.05).The wound healing time in group C was shorter than that in group B(P<0.05),and the differences of the healing stage between the three groups were not statistically significant(P>0.05).The minimal cross-sectional area of nasal cavity in group C at postoperative 3 months and 1 year were significantly higher than that in A and B groups.Conclusions:The clinical effect of the single pedicle sticky periosteum or perichondrium flip flap combined with free temporal fascia flap repair method in the treatment of nasal septum perforation is good,which in improving the nasal ventilation function is better than that in autologous temporal fascia and perpendicular plate of ethmoid bone sandwich technique,and autograft with pedicle nasal mucoperiosteal flap repair method.