管状胃与全胃代食管术对食管癌的疗效比较

张雪梅; 程辉

doi:10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2017.07.026

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

管状胃与全胃代食管术对食管癌的疗效比较

张雪梅 , 程辉

文章导航 > 蚌埠医学院学报 > 2017, 42 > 7: (919-921)

引用本文:

Citation:

管状胃与全胃代食管术对食管癌的疗效比较

张雪梅,
程辉

安徽省淮北市人民医院胸外科, 235000

作者简介: 张雪梅(1980-),女,主治医师.

中图分类号: R735.1

Efficacy comparison of the tubular stomach with full and full gastroesopha-geal anastomosis surgery in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma

Department of Thoracic Surgery, The People's Hospital of Huaibei, Huaibei Anhui 235000, China
CLC number: R735.1

摘要: 目的：比较管状胃与全胃代食管术治疗食管癌的临床疗效。方法：选取食管癌病人46例，术后生存期均超过1年，根据消化系统重建方式分为管状胃组26例与全胃组20例。管状胃组给予管状胃食管吻合术治疗，全胃组给予全胃食管吻合术治疗。比较2组手术情况、手术前后肺功能指标及术后生活质量。结果：2组病人手术时间、术中出血量、胸腔引流量和住院时间差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）；管状胃组肺部并发症和反流性食管炎发生率均低于全胃组（P<0.05）；2组病人术后最大通气量占预计值百分比、1 s用力呼气容积占预计值百分比和肺活量占预计值百分比均较术前明显下降，全胃组下降更显著（P<0.01）；管状胃组病人术后6个月、12个月生活质量评分均明显高于术后3周，且均明显高于术后同期全胃组评分（P<0.01）。结论：管状胃代食管术相对于全胃代食管术治疗食管癌可有效降低反流性食管炎和肺部并发症发生率，同时对病人术后肺功能影响小，术后短期生存质量更高。
- 食管肿瘤 /
- 管状胃食管吻合术 /
- 全胃食管吻合术
Abstract: Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of tubular in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma.Methods:Forty-six patients with esophageal cancer(survival time more than 1 year) were divided into the tubular stomach group(26 cases) and full stomach group(20 cases) according to the digestive tract reconstruction way.The tubular stomach group and full stomach group were treated with tubular gastroesophageal anastomosis surgery and full gastroesophageal anastomosis surgery,respectively.The operation condition,lung function and quality of life before and after operation between two groups were compared.Results:The differences of the operative time,intraoperative blood loss,chest drainage and length of hospital stay between two groups were not statistically significant(P>0.05).The incidence rates of pulmonary complications and reflux esophagitis in tubular stomach group were lower than those in full stomach group(P<0.05).Compared with before operation,the MMV%,FEV1% and VC% in two groups significantly decreased,and the decreasing degree of which in full stomach group was more obvious after operation(P<0.01).The scores of quality of life of 6 and 12 months in tubular stomach group were significantly higher than that of 3 weeks after operation,and significantly higher than that of same postoperative period in full stomach group(P<0.01).Conclusions:Compared with full gastroesophageal anastomosis surgery,the tubular gastroesophaged anastomosis surgery can effectively reduce the reflux esophagitis and incidence rate of pulmonary complications,has little effect on postoperative pulmonary function and high short-term quality of life.
- esophageal neoplasms /
- tubular gastroesophageal anastomosis surgery /
- full gastroesophageal anastomosis surgery

[1]	赵进明,彭俊生.食管癌术后消化道重建方式的评价[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2014,17(5):435.
[2]	贲晨,赵伟,黄克诚.经右胸食管癌切除术配合管状胃成形在食管癌治疗中的临床应用[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2015,40(7):938.
[3]	周天骏,敖翔,李钰泉,等.管状胃在食管癌根治术中的应用及意义[J].中华实验外科杂志,2013,30(5):1057.
[4]	李林峻,吴庆琛,张诚,等.食管癌切除不同消化道重建方式术后病人生命质量对比分析[J].中华医学杂志,2013,93(35):2790.
[5]	周波,何明学.管状胃在食管癌根治术中的临床应用效果评价[J].医学综述,2014,20(15):2825.
[6]	张爱民,张庆波,张小翠.两种吻合术对食管癌术后抗反流的对比研究[J].中国现代医学杂志,2015,25(13):102.
[7]	殷汉华,李瑞华,肖敬东.管状胃对食管癌术后胃食管返流的影响[J].海南医学,2015,26(10):1434.
[8]	俞经生,祝会斌,钟鲁.胃管状成形重建食管在食管癌根治术中的应用体会[J].安徽医学,2015,36(9):1138.
[9]	徐林友,洪伟.管状胃进行消化道重建在食管癌根治术中的运用[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2014,13(1):29.
[10]	廖泽飞,马良赟,林勇龙,等.管状胃代食管与传统食管癌手术后肺部并发症的对比研究[J].临床肺科杂志,2013,18(2):201.
[11]	杨纪林.食管癌切除术中管状胃与全胃代食管对病人术后生活质量影响的对比研究[J].实用癌症杂志,2014,29(11):1428.
[12]	刘宝兴,李印,秦建军,等.胸腹腔镜联合与常规三切口食管次全切除术治疗食管癌的比较研究[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2012,15(9):938.
[13]	周曼新,杨逊军,岑家福,等.管状胃食管吻合术与全胃代食管吻合术对食管癌病人术后食管反流及生活质量的对比研究[J].检验医学与临床,2014,11(SupplⅠ):10.

[1]	李伊敏 , 程树红 , 张世豪 . IPCL分类对食管早期肿瘤诊断价值的应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2019, 44(6): 742-744. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2019.06.012
[2]	蒋朋朋 , 王兴邦 , 霍前伦 . 全腔镜食管癌根治McKeown术式发生吻合口瘘的危险因素分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2022, 47(9): 1229-1232. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2022.09.019
[3]	于东红 , 周蕾 , 郭冰沁 , 承泽农 , 王萍 . MMP-2、Ki67在食管癌中的表达及与肿瘤增殖、转移的关系. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2005, 30(5): 383-385.
[4]	孙荣贵 , 姬德宇 , 陆方 , 付其贵 , 吴志勇 . 食管胃颈部侧侧T吻合在胸腹腔镜联合下食管癌根治术中的应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2022, 47(5): 616-618. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2022.05.014
[5]	郭伟 , 张明亮 , 刘先富 , 陈晨 . 管状胃重建在食管癌手术中的应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2013, 37(8): 941-943.
[6]	孙仲涛 , 肖民 . 机械吻合在食管癌及贲门癌消化道重建术中的应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2008, 33(3): 310-311.
[7]	贲晨 , 赵伟 , 黄克诚 . 经右胸食管癌切除术配合管状胃成形在食管癌治疗中的临床应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2015, 39(7): 938-940. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2015.07.037
[8]	黄琨 , 胡涛 , 高琦 . 改良非切割型管状胃在食管癌根治术中的应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2020, 45(9): 1243-1246. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2020.09.027
[9]	朱道明 , 乔月华 , 郭方霞 . 内镜下食管贲门癌术后吻合口狭窄扩张治疗. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2009, 34(7): 616-616.
[10]	缪劲 , 张雷杨 , 高岩 , 陈鑫 , 张爱平 , 郭子黄 . 残胃并存食管癌手术消化道重建方式和手术入路的选择. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2006, 31(6): 653-654.
[11]	方明 , 张荣新 , 朱金海 . 食管癌术后胃瘫综合征23例临床分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2014, 38(3): 315-317.
[12]	周慧赟 , 张素琴 , 王磊 , 张雪琴 , 袁牧 . 数字减影血管造影下食管内支架置入术治疗食管癌伴狭窄或食管气管瘘的护理体会. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2015, 40(12): 1742-1744. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2015.12.047
[13]	张万高 , 雷金生 , 张玉梅 . 晚期食管癌食管内支架置入、动脉插管灌注化疗分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2006, 31(3): 290-292.
[14]	李小军 , 宋超 , 刘戈 , 刘学刚 , 王祖义 , 刘以尧 . 食管癌切除管状吻合器消化道重建392例临床分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2013, 37(8): 944-945.
[15]	植永宁 . 腹段食管癌及贲门癌手术径路探讨. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2006, 31(5): 544-545.
[16]	王刚 , 高峰 , 杨晓松 , 田聪 , 吴克松 , 李新亚 . 食管癌患者80例围手术期处理. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2012, 36(6): 653-654.
[17]	杨大彬 , 吴凯 , 任强 . 胸腹腔镜联合Mckeown手术在食管癌中的应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2013, 37(9): 1086-1088.
[18]	李向阳 , 丁友宏 , 邱亮 , 严士光 , 孙标 , 闫坤 . 根治性放疗后短期复发食管癌的手术治疗. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2013, 37(11): 1438-1440.
[19]	李化龙 , 黄关宏 , 王忠明 . 食管癌的标志物研究进展. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2010, 35(10): 1071-1073.
[20]	刘艳平 , 彭开桂 , 李多杰 . 原发性食管小细胞癌的诊治进展. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2012, 36(11): 1390-1392.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 3589
HTML全文浏览量: 592
PDF下载量: 81
被引次数: 0

管状胃与全胃代食管术对食管癌的疗效比较

张雪梅
程辉

作者简介: 张雪梅(1980-),女,主治医师.

安徽省淮北市人民医院胸外科, 235000

收稿日期: 2016-03-31

关键词:

摘要: 目的：比较管状胃与全胃代食管术治疗食管癌的临床疗效。方法：选取食管癌病人46例，术后生存期均超过1年，根据消化系统重建方式分为管状胃组26例与全胃组20例。管状胃组给予管状胃食管吻合术治疗，全胃组给予全胃食管吻合术治疗。比较2组手术情况、手术前后肺功能指标及术后生活质量。结果：2组病人手术时间、术中出血量、胸腔引流量和住院时间差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）；管状胃组肺部并发症和反流性食管炎发生率均低于全胃组（P<0.05）；2组病人术后最大通气量占预计值百分比、1 s用力呼气容积占预计值百分比和肺活量占预计值百分比均较术前明显下降，全胃组下降更显著（P<0.01）；管状胃组病人术后6个月、12个月生活质量评分均明显高于术后3周，且均明显高于术后同期全胃组评分（P<0.01）。结论：管状胃代食管术相对于全胃代食管术治疗食管癌可有效降低反流性食管炎和肺部并发症发生率，同时对病人术后肺功能影响小，术后短期生存质量更高。

English Abstract

Efficacy comparison of the tubular stomach with full and full gastroesopha-geal anastomosis surgery in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma

Department of Thoracic Surgery, The People's Hospital of Huaibei, Huaibei Anhui 235000, China

Received Date: 2016-03-31

Abstract: Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of tubular in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma.Methods:Forty-six patients with esophageal cancer(survival time more than 1 year) were divided into the tubular stomach group(26 cases) and full stomach group(20 cases) according to the digestive tract reconstruction way.The tubular stomach group and full stomach group were treated with tubular gastroesophageal anastomosis surgery and full gastroesophageal anastomosis surgery,respectively.The operation condition,lung function and quality of life before and after operation between two groups were compared.Results:The differences of the operative time,intraoperative blood loss,chest drainage and length of hospital stay between two groups were not statistically significant(P>0.05).The incidence rates of pulmonary complications and reflux esophagitis in tubular stomach group were lower than those in full stomach group(P<0.05).Compared with before operation,the MMV%,FEV1% and VC% in two groups significantly decreased,and the decreasing degree of which in full stomach group was more obvious after operation(P<0.01).The scores of quality of life of 6 and 12 months in tubular stomach group were significantly higher than that of 3 weeks after operation,and significantly higher than that of same postoperative period in full stomach group(P<0.01).Conclusions:Compared with full gastroesophageal anastomosis surgery,the tubular gastroesophaged anastomosis surgery can effectively reduce the reflux esophagitis and incidence rate of pulmonary complications,has little effect on postoperative pulmonary function and high short-term quality of life.