-
髋关节置换术(hip arthroplasty,HA)又称人工髋关节置换术[1],近年来,因微创外科技术的快速发展,其创伤更小、假体置入后更稳定、机体结构离断更少,而且可以显著减少术后并发症的发生、促进髋骨功能恢复,因此为临床广泛应用。但微创手术术后常规护理仍发生较多的并发症或髋骨功能恢复慢等问题,从而给病人的生活质量造成不良影响[2]。因此,应用更为有效的护理模式以提升HA术后恢复效果仍是当前护理研究的重点内容。有研究[3]指出,基于力学原理的护理干预可以有效维持关节功能,减少HA术后压力性损伤的发生风险,促进预后效果。基于此,本研究以112例HA病人作为研究对象,旨在探究改善髋关节功能及促进预后更为有效的治疗方法。现作报道。
-
观察组病人压力性损伤发生率为3.57%,低于对照组的14.39%(P < 0.05)(见表 1)。
分组 n 无压力性
损伤Ⅰ期
压力性损伤Ⅱ期压力性
损伤uc P 观察组 56 54(96.43) 2(3.57) 0(0.00) 对照组 56 48(85.71) 7(12.50) 1(1.79) 1.99 < 0.05 合计 112 102(91.07) 9(8.04) 1(0.89) 表 1 2组病人压力性损伤发生情况比较[n;百分率(%)]
-
观察组病人临床护理总满意度为92.86%,明显高于对照组的78.57%(P < 0.01)(见表 2)。
分组 n 很满意 满意 一般满意 不满意 总满意 uc P 观察组 56 21(37.50) 23(41.07) 8(14.29) 4(7.14) 52(92.86) 对照组 56 7(12.50) 21(37.50) 16(28.57) 12(21.43) 49(78.57) 3.68 < 0.01 合计 112 28(25.00) 44(39.29) 24(21.43) 16(14.29) 101(90.18) 表 2 2组病人临床护理满意度比较[n;百分率(%)]
-
观察组病人髋关节疼痛、关节功能、畸形、活动度评分及Harris总分均明显高于对照组(P < 0.01)(见表 3)。
分组 疼痛 关节功能 畸形 活动度 总分 观察组 40.14±2.4 44.15±3.38 4.62±1.18 4.87±1.17 93.78±8.13 对照组 33.92±3.73 37.51±3.46 3.04±0.92 3.41±0.85 77.88±8.96 t 10.49 10.27 7.90 7.56 9.84 P < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 表 3 2组病人髋关节Harris评分比较(ni=56;x±s;分)
基于力学原理的护理干预在髋关节置换术后的应用
Application of nursing intervention based on mechanics principle in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty
-
摘要:
目的探讨基于力学原理的护理干预在髋关节置换术后应用的临床效果。 方法选取112例髋关节置换术病人作为研究对象,按护理方法分为2组,每组56例,对照组行常规护理,观察组行常规联合基于力学原理的护理。比较2组病人压力性损伤发生情况、临床护理满意度及髋关节Harris评分(包括疼痛、关节功能、畸形、活动度)。 结果观察组病人压力性损伤发生率为3.57%,低于对照组的14.39%(P < 0.05)。观察组病人临床护理总满意度为92.86%,明显高于对照组的78.57%(P < 0.01)。观察组病人髋关节疼痛、关节功能、畸形、活动度评分及Harris总分均明显高于对照组(P < 0.01)。 结论对髋关节置换术后病人行基于力学原理的护理效果较好,可以减少压力性损伤的发生、提高护理满意度、改善髋关节功能,对预后有益,值得推广使用。 Abstract:ObjectiveTo explore the clinical effect of nursing intervention based on mechanics principle in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. MethodsA total of 112 patients undergoing hip arthroplasty were divided into two groups according to the nursing methods.The control group(n=56) was treated with routine nursing, and the observation group(n=56) was treated with routine nursing combined mechanics principle-based nursing.The incidence of stress injury, clinical nursing satisfaction and Harris score of hip joint(including pain, joint function, deformity and mobility) were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe incidence of pressure injury in observation group (3.57%) was lower than that in control group (14.39%)(P < 0.05).The total satisfaction of clinical nursing in observation group was 92.86%, which was significantly higher than that in control group (78.57%)(P < 0.01).Harris total score and the scores of pain, joint function, deformity and mobility in observation group were significantly higher than those in control group (P < 0.01). ConclusionThe effect of nursing intervention based on mechanics principle in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty is obvious.It can reduce the occurrence of pressure injury, improve the satisfaction of nursing, and improve the function of hip joint, which is beneficial to the prognosis and worth promoting. -
Key words:
- hip arthroplasty /
- mechanics principle /
- nursing
-
表 1 2组病人压力性损伤发生情况比较[n;百分率(%)]
分组 n 无压力性
损伤Ⅰ期
压力性损伤Ⅱ期压力性
损伤uc P 观察组 56 54(96.43) 2(3.57) 0(0.00) 对照组 56 48(85.71) 7(12.50) 1(1.79) 1.99 < 0.05 合计 112 102(91.07) 9(8.04) 1(0.89) 表 2 2组病人临床护理满意度比较[n;百分率(%)]
分组 n 很满意 满意 一般满意 不满意 总满意 uc P 观察组 56 21(37.50) 23(41.07) 8(14.29) 4(7.14) 52(92.86) 对照组 56 7(12.50) 21(37.50) 16(28.57) 12(21.43) 49(78.57) 3.68 < 0.01 合计 112 28(25.00) 44(39.29) 24(21.43) 16(14.29) 101(90.18) 表 3 2组病人髋关节Harris评分比较(ni=56;x±s;分)
分组 疼痛 关节功能 畸形 活动度 总分 观察组 40.14±2.4 44.15±3.38 4.62±1.18 4.87±1.17 93.78±8.13 对照组 33.92±3.73 37.51±3.46 3.04±0.92 3.41±0.85 77.88±8.96 t 10.49 10.27 7.90 7.56 9.84 P < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 -
[1] BROCKBANK J, WOLOWACZ S.Economic evaluations of new oral anticoagulants for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement:A systematic review[J].Pharmacoeconomics, 2017, 35(5):517. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0486-4 [2] 刘迎春, 彭贵凌.基于风险评估策略下分层护理干预在老年髋关节置换术患者中的应用研究[J].中国实用护理杂志, 2017, 33(9):669. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2017.09.007 [3] 单亚楠, 董丽.高龄股骨颈骨折病人行人工髋关节置换术的围术期护理[J].实用临床医药杂志, 2016, 20(6):76. [4] 任高宏.临床骨科诊断与治疗[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 2015. [5] 王任才, 邓秋奎, 樊磊, 等.老年股骨颈骨折患者全髋关节置换与半髋关节置换的临床治疗效果分析[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究, 2017, 14(3):73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5972.2017.03.020 [6] 邓欣, 吕娟, 陈佳丽, 等.2016年最新压疮指南解读[J].华西医学, 2016(9):1496. [7] JO CH, CHAI JW, JEONG EC, et al.Intra-articular injection of mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee:A 2-year follow-up study[J].Am J Sports Med, 2017, 45(7):2774. [8] 孙友强, 邵敏, 何伟, 等.人工关节置换与内固定修复老年股骨转子间骨折的Meta分析[J].中国组织工程研究, 2016, 20(13):1954. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2016.13.018 [9] 王素华, 林淑华, 李玉珍, 等.人体力学在人工髋关节置换术后体位变换中的应用效果[J].护理实践与研究, 2017, 13(9):61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2017.09.025 [10] 王梅, 朱坤, 张峰.全髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折患者的围手术期护理[J].蚌埠医学院学报, 2014, 39(12):1740. [11] 彭嘉斌, 戴祝, 廖瑛, 等.运动力学对线在全膝关节置换术中的应用[J].国际骨科学杂志, 2016, 37(6):354. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7083.2016.06.004 -
202004034.pdf