-
脂溢性脱发在临床上又被称为雄性激素性脱发,病人通常是在20岁左右即逐渐出现以顶部、颞部、额部为主的进行性缓慢脱发,以男性、年龄20~30岁较多见[1-2]。该病具有一个进行性加重的过程,应及时进行早期干预治疗,包括使用毛发移植、外用药物和内用药物等[3-4]。为探讨清热祛湿方联合温针对脂溢性脱发病人的临床疗效,选取72例脂溢性脱发病人展开相关研究。现作报道。
-
2组病人治疗3个月后,观察组病人治疗总有效率为80.56%,高于对照组的50.00%(P < 0.05)(见表 1)。治疗6个月后,观察组病人治疗总有效率为94.44%,亦高于对照组的63.89%(P < 0.05)(见表 2)。
分组 n 无效 有效 显效 治愈 总有效 uc P 对照组 36 18 13 5 0 18(50.00) 观察组 36 7 21 7 1 29(80.56) 5.45 < 0.05 合计 72 25 34 12 1 47(65.28) 表 1 2组病人治疗3个月后临床疗效比较[n;百分率(%)]
分组 n 无效 有效 显效 治愈 总有效 uc P 对照组 36 13 15 8 0 23(63.89) 观察组 36 2 22 10 2 34(94.44) 5.73 < 0.05 合计 72 15 37 18 2 57(79.17) 表 2 2组病人治疗6个月后临床疗效比较[n;百分率(%)]
清热祛湿方联合温针对脂溢性脱发的临床疗效
Effect of Qingre Qushi decoction combined with warming acupuncture in the treatment of seborrheic alopecia
-
摘要:
目的观察清热祛湿方联合温针治疗脂溢性脱发的临床效果。 方法选取脂溢性脱发病人72例,按照随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,各36例。对照组病人给予常规药物治疗,观察组病人在此基础上给予清热祛湿方联合温针进行治疗。比较2组病人治疗后3、6个月的疗效。 结果2组病人治疗3个月后,观察组病人治疗总有效率为80.56%,高于对照组的50.00%(P < 0.05)。治疗6个月后,观察组病人治疗总有效率为94.44%,亦高于对照组的63.89%(P < 0.05)。 结论对脂溢性脱发病人联合采用清热祛湿方和温针治疗能够改善病人的临床疗效,值得临床推广应用。 Abstract:ObjectiveTo analyze the effects of Qingre Qushi decoction combined with warming acupuncture in the treatment of seborrheic alopecia. MethodsSeventy-two patients with seborrheic alopecia were randomly divided into the control group and observation group according to the random number table method(36 cases in each group). The control group was treated with routine drug, and the observation group was treated with Qingre Qushi decoction combined with warming acupuncture on the basis of routine drug treatment. The therapeutic effects between two groups were compared after 3 and 6 months of treatment. ResultsAfter 3 months of treatment, the total effective rate in observation group (80.56%) was higher than that in control group (50.00%) (P < 0.05). After 6 months of treatment, the total effective rate in observation group (94.44%) was higher than that in control group (63.89%) (P < 0.05). ConclusionsThe Qingre Qushi decoction combined with warming acupuncture in the treatment of seborrheic alopecia can effectively improve the clinical effects, it is worthy of clinical application. -
Key words:
- seborrheic alopecia /
- warming acupuncture /
- Qingre Qushi decoction /
- baldness
-
表 1 2组病人治疗3个月后临床疗效比较[n;百分率(%)]
分组 n 无效 有效 显效 治愈 总有效 uc P 对照组 36 18 13 5 0 18(50.00) 观察组 36 7 21 7 1 29(80.56) 5.45 < 0.05 合计 72 25 34 12 1 47(65.28) 表 2 2组病人治疗6个月后临床疗效比较[n;百分率(%)]
分组 n 无效 有效 显效 治愈 总有效 uc P 对照组 36 13 15 8 0 23(63.89) 观察组 36 2 22 10 2 34(94.44) 5.73 < 0.05 合计 72 15 37 18 2 57(79.17) -
[1] RAFFI J, SURESH R, AGBAI O. Clinical recognition and management of alopecia in women of color[J]. Int J Womens Dermatol, 2019, 5(5): 314. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2019.08.005 [2] PAN Q, CHENG Y, SHAO ZG, et al. Prediction of rat liver transplantation outcomes using energy metabolites measured by microdialysis[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2018, 17(5): 392. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2018.09.002 [3] 刘保红, 赵志恒, 焦召华, 等. 脱发部位的经络辨证关系探微[J]. 中医学报, 2017, 32(8): 1459. [4] 夏靖, 倪诚. 从湿热体质论治脂溢性脱发[J]. 天津中医药, 2019, 36(12): 1149. doi: 10.11656/j.issn.1672-1519.2019.12.02 [5] 张学军. 皮肤性病学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 182. [6] 项晶, 边晓东. 施氏温针配合中药治疗脂溢性脱发的疗效观察[J]. 上海针灸杂志, 2018, 37(5): 544. [7] 张雪松, 周冬梅. 祛湿健发汤联合梅花针扣刺治疗脾虚湿滞型脂溢性脱发的临床效果[J]. 中国医药导报, 2019, 16(25): 126. [8] 高建英, 刘海金, 谢亚彬, 等. 腹针结合艾灸治疗男性气血两虚型脂溢性脱发疗效观察[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2017, 26(3): 307. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8849.2017.03.028 [9] 赵致然, 陈志强, 王生隆, 等. 脂溢性脱发的机制和药物治疗进展[J]. 西北药学杂志, 2016, 31(4): 440. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2407.2016.04.037 [10] 王屹, 王雪, 李慧, 等. 自体毛发移植治疗脂溢性脱发临床分析[J]. 中国医疗美容, 2017, 7(12): 17. [11] 赵玉玲, 霍青云, 周芳, 等. 邱明义教授治疗脂溢性脱发的经验[J]. 环球中医药, 2017, 10(8): 891. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1749.2017.08.025 [12] 杜雪萌, 孙世发. 外用生发方剂用药及配伍规律研究[J]. 中医学报, 2016, 31(3): 405. [13] 孔莹, 王子微, 王策, 等. 针药并用治疗男性湿热上蒸型脂溢性脱发的疗效观察[J]. 上海针灸杂志, 2019, 38(4): 436. [14] 王艳, 张倩影. 祛脂生发饮联合非那雄胺治疗脾胃湿热型脂溢性脱发疗效及对发中微量元素水平的影响[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2018, 27(12): 1338. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8849.2018.12.024 [15] 潘立文, 段利生, 陆鸿奎, 等. 从脾肾论治脂溢性脱发[J]. 长春中医药大学学报, 2017, 33(3): 408. [16] ZHANG WP, ONOSE Y, FUJIKAWA T. A trial study of moxibustion with a warming needle on edema[J]. J Acupunct Meridian Stud, 2017, 10(1): 20. doi: 10.1016/j.jams.2016.12.008