-
近年来,甲状腺癌的临床发病率有显著增加的趋势,其中以甲状腺乳头状癌较为多见,在甲状腺癌中的发生率超过70%[1]。甲状腺癌病人在疾病中晚期容易出现颈部的淋巴结转移,病人在早期并无明显症状,因此临床诊断的难度较高[2]。超声检查是重要的临床影像诊断方式,其方法安全、方便,且价格低廉,在很多疾病的早期诊断中都具有重要的价值[3-4]。本研究对在我院接受治疗的甲状腺癌病人进行血流动力学指标的多普勒超声检测,并分析其与淋巴结转移的相关性,目的是为临床甲状腺乳头状癌的早期诊断提供理论参考。
-
观察组患侧甲状腺部位的S、PSV和D指标均明显高于观察组健侧和对照组,而PI、RI指标明显低于观察组健侧和对照组(P<0.01)(见表 1)。
分组 n S/(cm/s) D/(cm/s) S/D PI PSV/(cm/s) RI 观察组健侧 68 22.59±2.84 6.69±1.13 3.38±0.91 1.27±0.22 53.18±4.08 0.70±0.11 观察组患侧 68 46.52±6.38** 27.54±6.59** 1.69±0.38** 0.88±0.15** 85.48±5.89** 0.54±0.08** 对照组左侧 40 22.38±2.79△△ 7.02±1.11△△ 3.19±0.89△△ 1.25±0.28△△ 52.23±3.97△△ 0.68±0.12△△ 对照组右侧 40 22.59±2.84△△ 6.84±1.09△△ 3.27±0.93△△ 1.24±0.24△△ 52.56±4.02△△ 0.69±0.13△△ F — 487.55 457.59 66.19 46.59 753.04 31.17 P — < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 MS组内 — 18.328 14.573 0.612 0.047 22.097 0.012 q检验:与观察组健侧比较**P<0.01;与观察组患侧比较△△P<0.01 表 1 2组血流动力学指标比较(x±s)
-
有淋巴结转移病人的PSV、RI和血流信号分级均明显高于无淋巴结转移甲状腺癌病人(P<0.01)(见表 2)。
分组 n PSV/(cm/s) RI 血流信号分级 0 1 2 3 无淋巴结转移 40 17.36±2.35 0.71±0.05 3 9 21 7 有淋巴结转移 28 26.94±3.31 0.84±0.12 5 10 8 5 t′ — 13.17 5.41 -3.31* P — < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 *示zc值 表 2 甲状腺癌病人有无淋巴结转移病人的血流指标比较(x±s)
多普勒超声对甲状腺癌病人血流动力学指标评估及与淋巴结转移的相关性分析
Evaluation of hemodynamic indexes and correlation with lymph node metastasis in patients with thyroid carcinoma by Doppler ultrasound
-
摘要:
目的分析甲状腺癌病人采用多普勒超声进行血流动力学指标评估效果及相应指标与淋巴结转移的相关性。 方法选取甲状腺癌病人68例作为观察组,同期随机选取门诊体检的健康人40名作为对照组。对病人进行多普勒超声检查和血流动力学指标检测评估,同时检测病人的淋巴结肿大情况,并分析其相关性。 结果观察组患侧甲状腺部位的动脉收缩期峰值、血流速度(PSV)和舒张末期血流速度均明显高于观察组健侧和对照组(P<0.01),而搏动指数、血液血流阻力指数(RI)则明显低于观察组健侧和对照组(P<0.01);有淋巴结转移病人的PSV、RI和血流信号分级均明显高于无淋巴结转移甲状腺癌病人(P<0.01)。 结论在甲状腺癌病人多普勒超声诊断中显示血流动力学指标与淋巴结转移密切相关,也是术前评估甲状腺癌的重要参考指标。 Abstract:ObjectiveTo investigate the correlation between hemodynamic indexes and lymph node metastasis in patients with thyroid cancer using Doppler ultrasound. MethodsA total of 68 patients with thyroid cancer were selected as the observation group.The healthy subjects from the outpatient clinic were randomly selected as the control group.Doppler ultrasound was performed to evaluate the hemodynamic indexes, and the lymph node enlargement was detected and correlation analysis was performed. ResultsThe systolic peak value, peak systolic velocity(PSV) and the end-diastolic blood flow velocity of the affected side in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the healthy side and the control group, while the pulsation index and blood flow resistance index(RI) were lower than those in the healthy side and the control group(P<0.01).The PSV, RI and blood flow signal grades of patients with lymph node metastasis were higher than those of patients without lymph node metastasis(P<0.01). ConclusionsDoppler ultrasound diagnosis of thyroid cancer patients shows that hemodynamic indexes are closely related to lymph node.metastasis, and it is also an important reference index for preoperative evaluation of thyroid cancer. -
Key words:
- thyroid neoplasms /
- Doppler ultrasound /
- hemodynamic indexes /
- lymph node metastasis
-
表 1 2组血流动力学指标比较(x±s)
分组 n S/(cm/s) D/(cm/s) S/D PI PSV/(cm/s) RI 观察组健侧 68 22.59±2.84 6.69±1.13 3.38±0.91 1.27±0.22 53.18±4.08 0.70±0.11 观察组患侧 68 46.52±6.38** 27.54±6.59** 1.69±0.38** 0.88±0.15** 85.48±5.89** 0.54±0.08** 对照组左侧 40 22.38±2.79△△ 7.02±1.11△△ 3.19±0.89△△ 1.25±0.28△△ 52.23±3.97△△ 0.68±0.12△△ 对照组右侧 40 22.59±2.84△△ 6.84±1.09△△ 3.27±0.93△△ 1.24±0.24△△ 52.56±4.02△△ 0.69±0.13△△ F — 487.55 457.59 66.19 46.59 753.04 31.17 P — < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 MS组内 — 18.328 14.573 0.612 0.047 22.097 0.012 q检验:与观察组健侧比较**P<0.01;与观察组患侧比较△△P<0.01 表 2 甲状腺癌病人有无淋巴结转移病人的血流指标比较(x±s)
分组 n PSV/(cm/s) RI 血流信号分级 0 1 2 3 无淋巴结转移 40 17.36±2.35 0.71±0.05 3 9 21 7 有淋巴结转移 28 26.94±3.31 0.84±0.12 5 10 8 5 t′ — 13.17 5.41 -3.31* P — < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 *示zc值 -
[1] SEIB CD, SOSA JA. Evolving understanding of the epidemiology of thyroid cancer[J]. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am, 2019, 48(1): 2. [2] FILETTI S, DURANTE C, HARTL D, et al. Thyroid cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up[J]. Ann Oncol, 2019, 30(12): 1856. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz400 [3] 张艳, 马冰, 赵佳航, 等. 经淋巴管超声造影诊断甲状腺癌颈部淋巴结转移的价值[J]. 中国医学科学院学报, 2021, 43(3): 338. [4] 辛世卿. 高分辨率超声联合CT对甲状腺癌颈部淋巴结转移的临床诊断价值[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2021, 19(1): 5. [5] 魏亚丽, 陈国萍, 曾浪, 等. 多普勒超声对甲状腺癌患者血流动力学指标评估及与淋巴结转移的相关性分析[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2020, 19(16): 1779. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2020.16.029 [6] 孙思雨, 张晨嵩, 谢波, 等. 经腋窝入路免充气全腔镜甲状腺癌根治术和开放甲状腺癌根治术疗效对比[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2021, 46(2): 173. [7] 马孝广, 姚廷敬, 张年庆. 甲状腺系膜切除术对甲状腺乳头状癌病人复发转移率影响[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2020, 45(7): 906. [8] BAUER AJ. PEDIATRIC THYROID CANCER: genetics, therapeutics and outcome[J]. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am, 2020, 49(4): 589. [9] ANGELL TE, ALEXANDER EK. Thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer in the pregnant woman[J]. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am, 2019, 48(3): 557. [10] 吴多钢, 马雪宁, 王明威, 等. 多普勒超声对甲状腺癌血流动力学指标的评估及其与淋巴结转移的相关性[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2020, 23(9): 725. [11] 刘娇. 多普勒超声诊断甲状腺癌的应用[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2019, 3(2): 103. [12] 赖媛媛. 甲状腺癌诊断中彩色多普勒超声的应用[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2020, 4(11): 176.