-
目前,由于在我国女性盆底功能障碍(PFD)不受重视以及缺乏有效的早期诊断方法,就诊时多数病人已经出现比较严重的临床症状,如果能够在早期对该疾病进行诊断,多数病人可避免手术治疗,通过盆底肌肉功能训练等达到治疗的目的[1]。盆底超声是近年开始应用于临床的一种无创、简便的评估盆底功能的影像学方法,本研究采用经会阴实时三维盆底超声观察不同分娩方式在静息状态下、最大Valsalva动作后对产后女性肛提肌裂孔面积的影响,以期为临床提供早期、有效的诊断及疗效评估的依据。现作报道。
-
3组在静息状态下和最大Valsalva动作后肛提肌裂孔面积比较差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.01),选择性剖宫产组和对照组均低于经阴道分娩组(P < 0.05和P < 0.01),对照组均明显低于选择性剖宫产组(P < 0.01)(见表 1)。
分组 n 静息状态 最大Valsalva动作 经阴道分娩组 51 16.14±2.68 25.86±3.36 选择性剖宫产组 29 14.90±2.04* 23.14±2.17** 对照组 40 11.98±1.33**△△ 15.13±1.34**△△ F — 42.49 203.11 P — <0.01 <0.01 MS组内 — 4.655 6.570 q检验:与经阴道分娩组比较*P < 0.05,**P < 0.01;与选择性剖宫产组比较△△P < 0.01 表 1 3组不同状态下肛提肌裂孔面积比较(x±s;cm2)
-
分别将经阴道分娩组在静息状态、最大Valsalva动作后肛提肌裂孔面积与新生儿出生体质量进行相关性分析,二者均呈正相关关系(r=0.865、0.876)(见图 1)。
实时三维盆底超声评估不同分娩方式对产后女性肛提肌裂孔的影响
Effect of different delivery ways on postpartum hiatus of levator ani evaluated by real-time three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound
-
摘要:
目的采用经会阴实时三维盆底超声探讨不同分娩方式对产后女性肛提肌裂孔面积的影响。 方法选取就诊的80例产后6周女性(病例组)及40例未生育女性(对照组)作为研究对象,病例组又分为经阴道分娩组和选择性剖宫产组,对3组在静息状态下、最大Valsalva动作后肛提肌裂孔面积进行比较,评估不同分娩方式对产后女性肛提肌裂孔的影响,并将不同状态下经阴道分娩组肛提肌裂孔面积与新生儿出生体质量进行相关性分析。 结果3组在静息状态下和最大Valsalva动作后肛提肌裂孔面积比较差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01),选择性剖宫产组和对照组均低于经阴道分娩组(P < 0.05~P < 0.01),对照组低于选择性剖宫产组(P < 0.01);经阴道分娩组在静息状态下、最大Valsalva动作后肛提肌裂孔面积与新生儿出生体质量间均呈正相关关系(r=0.865、0.876)。 结论经会阴实时三维盆底超声可以通过测量肛提肌裂孔面积对产后女性盆底结构进行评估,具有无创简便、重复性好等优点,可以作为评估女性盆底功能的常规筛查方法,为临床诊断和治疗效果评价提供依据。 Abstract:ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of different delivery ways on the area of postpartum hiatus of levator ani evaluated by real-time three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound. MethodsEighty postpartum 6 weeks women and 40 nulliparous women were divided into the case group and control group, respectively.The case group was subdivided into the transvaginal delivery group and selective cesarean section group.The areas of postpartum hiatus of levator ani at rest and after the maxium Valsalva movement among three groups were compared, the effects of different delivery ways on the area of postpartum hiatus of levator ani were evaluated, and the correlation of the area of hiatus of levator ani in different states with neonatal weight was anlayzed in transvaginal delivery group. ResultsThe differences of the areas of hiatus of levator ani at rest and after the maxium Valsalva movement among three groups were statistically significant(P < 0.01), which in selective cesarean section group and control group was lower than that in transvaginal delivery group(P < 0.05 to P < 0.01), ans which in control group was lower than that in selective cesarean group(P < 0.01).The area of hiatus of levator ani at rest and after the maxium Valsalva movement in transvaginal delivery group was positively correlated with neonatal weight(r=0.865, 0.876). ConclusionsThe transperineal real-time three-dimensional ultrasound in evaluating the postpartum pelvic floor structure by measuring the area of hiatus of levator ani is noninvasive, convenient and repetitive, which can be used as a routine screening method, and provide the basis in the evaluation of clinic diagnosis and treatment effect. -
表 1 3组不同状态下肛提肌裂孔面积比较(x±s;cm2)
分组 n 静息状态 最大Valsalva动作 经阴道分娩组 51 16.14±2.68 25.86±3.36 选择性剖宫产组 29 14.90±2.04* 23.14±2.17** 对照组 40 11.98±1.33**△△ 15.13±1.34**△△ F — 42.49 203.11 P — <0.01 <0.01 MS组内 — 4.655 6.570 q检验:与经阴道分娩组比较*P < 0.05,**P < 0.01;与选择性剖宫产组比较△△P < 0.01 -
[1] 杨晓, 刘玉玲.盆底肌肉训练对产后盆底功能障碍的效果分析[J].国际妇产科学杂志, 2013, 40(2):164. [2] 张新玲, 黄泽萍, 毛永江.盆底超声的临床应用[M].广州:暨南大学出版社, 2013:33. [3] ORTVEIT G, BROWN JS, THORN DH, et al.Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse:prevalence and risk factors in a population-based, racially diverse cohort[J].Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 109(6):1396. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000263469.68106.90 [4] MANT J, PAINTER R, VESSEY M.Epidemiology of genital pmlapse:obser:vations from the oxford family planning association study[J].Br J Obstet Gynecol, 1997, 104(5):579. doi: 10.1111/bjo.1997.104.issue-5 [5] O'BOYLE AL, O'BOYLE JD, CALHOUN B, et al.Pelvic organ support in pregnancy and postpartum[J].Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 2005, 16(1):69. doi: 10.1007/s00192-004-1210-4 [6] AYDN S, TUNCEL MA, AYDN CA, et al.Do weprotectthepelvic floor with non-electivecesarean A study of 3-D/4-D pelvic floor ultrasound immediateIyafter delivery[J].J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2014, 40(4):1037. doi: 10.1111/jog.2014.40.issue-4 [7] 徐娆, 史铁梅, 林琳, 等.超声评价女性压力性尿失禁病人盆膈裂孔形态[J].中国医学影像技术, 2015, 31(11):1728. [8] 黄淑卿, 张新玲, 吴静.盆底超声在产后康复疗效评估中的应用[J].影像诊断介入放射学, 2015, 24(2):131. [9] 黄淑卿.经会阴超声在围生期的临床应用[J].中国医学影像技术, 2014, 30(9):1432. [10] 王竞宇, 陈艳, 张恩荣, 等.经会阴超声在女性盆底功能障碍性疾病中的应用[J].西部医学, 2013, 25(12):1869. [11] LIU F, XU L, YING T, et al.Three-dimensional ultrasound appearance of pelvic floor in nulliparous women and postpartum women one week after their first delivery[J].Int J Med Sci, 2014, 11(3):234. doi: 10.7150/ijms.7384