• 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国高校优秀期刊
  • 安徽省优秀科技期刊
Volume 45 Issue 10
Nov.  2020
Article Contents
Turn off MathJax

Citation:

Study on the application of ultrasound measurment of optic nerve sheath diameter in the severe preeclampsia with intracranial pressure increasing

  • Corresponding author: HE Xian-di, Byyfyhxd@163.com
  • Received Date: 2020-05-09
    Accepted Date: 2020-09-09
  • ObjectiveTo investigate the value ment of ultrasound measurment of optic nerve sheath diameter(ONSD) in the severe preeclampsia with intracranial pressure(ICP) increasing.MethodsForty-four pregnant women with severe preeclampsia and 30 single pregnant women without complications were divided into the observation group and control group, respectively.The MRI and ONSD in observation group were detected, and the observation group was subdivided into the normal ICP group and ICP increasing group according to the MRI results.The ONSD was measured in the control group.The differences of ONSD were compared among three groups.The ROC curve was used to explore the optimal threshold for ONSD detection in severe preepilepsy patients complicated with intracranial pressure increasing.ResultsThe differences of the systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, gestational weeks and ONSD values among three groups were statistically significant(P < 0.01), and the systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in ICP increasing group were significantly higher than those in control group and ICP normal group(P < 0.01).The gestational weeks in control group were significantly higher than that in observation group(P < 0.01).The ONSD values in ICP increasing group and normal group were significantly higher than that in control group(P < 0.01), and which in ICP increasing group was significantly higher than that in ICP normal group(P < 0.01).Under the ONSD measurement method, the AUC was 0.759 (95% CI:0.606~0.913, P < 0.01), the maximum Youden index was 0.497, the ONSD critical value was 4.0 mm, and the sensitivity was 62.2%.ConclusionsThe ultrasound measurement of ONSD can be used in the diagnosis of severe preepilepsia with ICP increasing, which has certain diagnostic value when ONSD is 4.0 mm.
  • 加载中
  • [1] DULEY L.The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia[J].Semin Perinatol, 2009, 33(3):130. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.02.010
    [2] BARTYNSKI WS.Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, part 2:Controversies surrounding pathophysiology of vasogenic edema[J].AJNR, 2008, 29(6), 1043. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0929
    [3] KUKLINA EV, AYALA C, CALLAGHAN WM.Hypertensive disorders and severe obstetric morbidity in the united states[J].Obstetr Gynecol, 2009, 113(6), 1299. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a45b25
    [4] DOELKEN M, LANZ S, RENNERT J, et al.Differentiation of cytotoxic and vasogenic edema in a patient with reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome using diffusion-weighted MRI[J].Diagn Interv Radiol 2007, 13:125.
    [5] HOEFNAGEL D, DAMMERS R, TER LAAK-POORT MP, et al.Risk factors for infections related to external ventricular drainage[J].Acta Neurochir, 2008, 150:209. doi: 10.1007/s00701-007-1458-9
    [6] 陈常兴, 俞康龙, 刘毅, 等.视神经鞘直径早期评估颅脑损伤的价值[J].中华急诊医学杂志, 2018, 27(2):208.
    [7] AMINI A, KARIMAN H, DOLATABADI AA, et al.Use of the sonographic diameter of optic nerve sheath to estimate intracranial pressure[J].Am J Emerg Med, 2013, 31(1):236. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.06.025
    [8] MAISSAN IM, DIRVEN PJ, HAITSMA IK, et al.Ultrasonographic measured optic nerve sheath diameter as an accurate and quick monitor for changes in intracranial pressure[J].J Neurosurg, 2015, 123(3):743. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS141197
    [9] DUBOST C, LE GOUEZ A, JOUFFROY V, et al.Optic nerve sheath diameter used as ultrasonographic assessment of the incidence of raised intracranial pressure in preeclampsia[J].Survey Anesthesiol, 2013, 57(3):126. doi: 10.1097/01.SA.0000428783.89112.c9
    [10] 中国医师协会高血压专业委员会.妊娠期高血压疾病血压管理中国专家共识[J].中华高血压杂志, 2012, 20(11):1023.
    [11] LOUREIRO R, LEITE CC, KAHHALE S, et al.Diffusion imaging may predict reversible brain lesions in eclampsia and severepreeclampsia:initial experience[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 189(5):1350. doi: 10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00651-3
    [12] 李梅.妊娠期高血压并发脑血管疾病的临床分析[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2015, 18(8):84.
    [13] 曲垟霖.妊娠期高血压疾病合并神经系统病变临床分析[D].长春: 吉林大学, 2019.
    [14] ANANTH CV, KEYES KM, WAPNER RJ.Preeclampsia rates in the United States, 1980-2010:age-period-conhort analysis[J].BMJ, 2013, 347:f6564. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6564
    [15] ROBILLARD PY, DEKKER G, IACOBELLI S, et al.An essay of reflection:Why doespreeclampsia existin humans, and why are there such huge geographical differences in epidemiology?[J].J Reprod Immunol, 2016, 114:44. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2015.07.001
    [16] KUEHL TJ, UDDIN MN, AHSAN GU, et al.Prevalence of preeclampsia in pregestational diabetic pregnancy in Bangladeshi patients[J].J Invest Med, 2015, 63:668.
    [17] 庄彩霞, 刘俊涛, 高劲松.中国人群子痫前期发病率和临床危险因素分析[J].生殖医学杂志, 2019, 28(4):336.
    [18] LOUREIRO R, LEITE CC, KAHHALE S, et al.Diffusion imaging may predict reversible brain lesions in eclampsia and severe preeclampsia:initial experience[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 189(5):1350. doi: 10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00651-3
    [19] POSSOMATO VIEIRA JS, KHALIL RA.Mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction in hypertensivepregnancy and preeclampsia[J].Adv Pharmacol, 2016, 77:361. doi: 10.1016/bs.apha.2016.04.008
    [20] 苏利, 李永超, 余青龙, 等.床旁超声与CT重建测量视神经鞘直径与颅内压的关系[J].中国CT和MRI杂志, 2020, 18(1):16.
    [21] HASSEN GW, BRUCK I, DONAHUE J, et al.Accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement by emergency physicians using bedside ultrasound[J].J Emerg Med, 2015, 48(4):450. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.09.060
    [22] 渠晓旭, 贾莉, 车秀媛, 等.超声测量视神经鞘直径对颅高压的诊疗价值研究[J].当代医学, 2020, 26(2):99.
    [23] ROBBA C, SANTORI G, CZOSNYKA M, et al.Optic nerve sheath diameter measured sonographically as non-invasive estimator of intracranial pressure:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Int Care Med, 2018, 44(8):1284. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5305-7
    [24] YOON SB, JI SH, JANG YE, et al.Effects of prone positioning with neck extension on intracranial pressure according to optic nerve sheath diameter measured using ultrasound in children[J].Childs Nerv Syst, 2020, 36(5):1001. doi: 10.1007/s00381-019-04442-3
    [25] LOCHNER P, BRIO F, ZEDDE ML, et al.Feasibility and usefulness of ultrasonography in idiopathic intracranial hypertension or secondary intracranial hypertension[J].BMC Neurol, 2016, 16:85. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0594-3
    [26] 利青, 钟秋红, 罗雪清, 等.经眼眶超声测量视神经鞘直径在诊断妊娠期高血压疾病患者颅内压增高中的价值[J].广西医学, 2017, 39(2):196.
    [27] SALAHUDDIN N, MOHAMED A, ALHARBI N, et al.The incidence of increased ICP in ICU patients with non-traumatic coma as diagnosed by ONSD and CT:a prospective cohort study[J].BMC Anesthesiol, 2016, 16(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0267-1
    [28] WANG L, FENG L, YAO Y, et al.Optimal optic nerve sheath diameter threshold for the identification of elevated opening pressure on lumbar puncture in Chinese population[J].PLoS One, 2015, 10:e0117939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117939
    [29] 过勇杰, 童武华, 张青贵, 等.超声测量视神经鞘直径筛查子痫前期患者颅内压增高的研究[J].浙江医学, 2019, 41(20):2168.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(3) / Tables(1)

Article views(5297) PDF downloads(19) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

Study on the application of ultrasound measurment of optic nerve sheath diameter in the severe preeclampsia with intracranial pressure increasing

    Corresponding author: HE Xian-di, Byyfyhxd@163.com
  • 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu Anhui 233004, China
  • 2. Department of Imaging Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu Anhui 233004, China

Abstract: ObjectiveTo investigate the value ment of ultrasound measurment of optic nerve sheath diameter(ONSD) in the severe preeclampsia with intracranial pressure(ICP) increasing.MethodsForty-four pregnant women with severe preeclampsia and 30 single pregnant women without complications were divided into the observation group and control group, respectively.The MRI and ONSD in observation group were detected, and the observation group was subdivided into the normal ICP group and ICP increasing group according to the MRI results.The ONSD was measured in the control group.The differences of ONSD were compared among three groups.The ROC curve was used to explore the optimal threshold for ONSD detection in severe preepilepsy patients complicated with intracranial pressure increasing.ResultsThe differences of the systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, gestational weeks and ONSD values among three groups were statistically significant(P < 0.01), and the systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in ICP increasing group were significantly higher than those in control group and ICP normal group(P < 0.01).The gestational weeks in control group were significantly higher than that in observation group(P < 0.01).The ONSD values in ICP increasing group and normal group were significantly higher than that in control group(P < 0.01), and which in ICP increasing group was significantly higher than that in ICP normal group(P < 0.01).Under the ONSD measurement method, the AUC was 0.759 (95% CI:0.606~0.913, P < 0.01), the maximum Youden index was 0.497, the ONSD critical value was 4.0 mm, and the sensitivity was 62.2%.ConclusionsThe ultrasound measurement of ONSD can be used in the diagnosis of severe preepilepsia with ICP increasing, which has certain diagnostic value when ONSD is 4.0 mm.

  • 目前国内外研究发现,子痫前期是一种多系统高血压疾病,且重度子痫前期是引起全球围生期疾病和死亡的重要因素之一[1-3]。虽然目前主要机制和发生率不清楚,但是确实在子痫前期的部分病人中颅内压(intracranial pressure,ICP)升高时有发生[4]。目前评估ICP仍以有创ICP监测为主,但有创监测有多种禁忌证,且有出血、感染等并发症,临床应用受限,并不适合于孕产妇[5]。近年来国内外大量研究[6-8]表明,超声测量视神经鞘直径(ONSD)用于评估ICP具有无创、准确、可重复性高等特点。国内外鲜有重度子痫前期病人ONSD值的超声研究,本文研究孕妇的ONSD与重度子痫前期ICP增高的相关性,研究其ICP增高时ONSD的最佳阈值,为诊断和治疗重度子痫前期ICP增高提供一定依据。

1.   资料与方法
  • 2018年8月至2020年1月在蚌埠医学院第一附属医院诊断为疑似子痫前期的44例单胎孕妇作为观察组,同时收集30例排除合并症的单胎孕妇为对照组。排除标准:明确表示拒绝、眼部外伤、眼部手术史或存在其他眼病史病人[9]。纳入标准:(1)病人出现头疼、视觉障碍、弥漫性脑水肿、意识模糊、视乳头水肿等ICP增高的疑似症状。(2)符合子痫前期的诊断标准,即妊娠≥20周后首次出现收缩压≥140 mmHg或舒张压≥90 mmHg,均进行2次测量,每次均符合要求,并且测量时间间隔至少6 h,蛋白尿≥0.3 g/24 h[10]。另外收集孕妇的孕周、孕产次数、年龄、体质量等基线信息。

  • 对照组的孕妇仅进行ONSD的测量,而观察组的孕妇需进行MRI和ONSD的检测和测量。采用SonoSite M-Turbo超声诊断仪5~10 MHz超声探头检查:经眼眶部位测量所有孕妇同一侧眼球后3 mm处的ONSD值,均需测量3次并算取平均值作为该孕妇的ONSD测量值(见图 1);对孕妇ICP增高的评定根据此孕妇的MRI检查结果判断(经同一位有丰富临床经验的影像学医生的判断):以MRI结果出现颅脑内出现异常,出现脑室、脑池、脑沟等改变,并出现脑水肿症状即为ICP增高[11]。此外,关于本研究的所有孕妇的基础临床资料对作为观察者的影像学医生设盲,观察组仅根据MRI实际检测结果分为ICP正常组和ICP增高组(见图 2)。

  • 采用单因素方差分析、q检验,使用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)并计算特异度和灵敏度。

2.   结果
  • 44例疑似子痫前期孕妇中可疑ICP增高的孕妇是19例(43.18%);最终依据MRI结果判断ICP增高的孕妇为14例(34.09%),结果显示,3组间孕妇的年龄、孕产次比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3组间收缩压、舒张压、孕周和ONSD值比较,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。其中收缩压和舒张压ICP增高组均显著高于ICP正常组和对照组,ICP增高组显著高于ICP正常组(P < 0.01);孕周对照组显著高于ICP正常组和ICP增高组;ONSD值ICP增高组和正常组显著高于对照组,ICP增高组显著高于ICP正常组(P < 0.01)(见表 1)。

    分组 n 年龄/岁 收缩压/mmHg 舒张压/mmHg 孕产次 孕周 ONSD/mm
    对照组 30 31.1±5.0 117.0±10.0 74.0±5.0 2±1 40.5±2.9 3.90±0.10
    ICP增高组 14 30.0±7.0    157.0±23.0**    105.0±20.0** 2±1    36.1±4.2**    4.70±0.30**
    ICP正常组 30 29.3±4.5     121.0±15.0##       76.0±13.0## 3±1    37.5±3.9**       4.10±0.10**##
    F 0.87 34.89 30.47 1.897 8.759 102.78
    P >0.05 < 0.01 < 0.01 >0.05 < 0.01 < 0.01
    MS组内 27.454 229.606 152.479 2.000 13.100 0.000
    与对照组比较**P < 0.01;与ICP增高组比较##P < 0.01
  • 超声ONSD筛查44例疑似子痫前期孕妇ICP增高的ROC曲线,其ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.759(P < 0.01),最大约登指数指数为0.497,对应的当ONSD值是4.0 mm为重度子痫前期病人的ICP增高最佳临阈值,此时的灵敏度和特异度分别为62.2%、87.5%(见图 3)。

3.   讨论
  • 子痫前期是全球孕产妇死亡的第二大原因,主要是由于急性脑并发症的发生[12-13]。有关其发病机制尚未明确,发病率全球各地差异也较大,有报道在全部妊娠中的发病率3.2%~12%[14-16],根据最新的报道显示,我国的发病率为4.2%[17]。ICP升高是子痫前期孕妇临床常见的综合征,一般ICP的增高由颅脑损伤、脑肿瘤、脑出血、脑积水和颅内炎症和感染等引发。ICP增高有时会引发脑疝危象,可使病人因呼吸循环衰竭而死亡。国外报道[18-19]指出,有71%~100%重度子痫前期的病人存在MRI表现脑水肿和ICP增高的情况。如何及时采用便捷的方式诊断子痫前期ICP增高,便于临床医生进行有效的治疗是目前亟需解决的首要问题。尽管目前有创性的ICP监测是临床首选,但是该检查有多种禁忌证,侵入性检测可能会引发感染、出血等风险[5],所以有创的ICP监测对于需求保守治疗的子痫前期孕妇并不适用。临床迫切需求准确、简单、无创的技术用于评估和监测孕妇的ICP增加情况。

    目前临床常用的无创ICP增高的辅助检测方法日益增多,包括经颅多普勒(TCD)、CT、MRI等并且各有优劣。目前TCD在无创ICP监测方面临床的认可度和普及度高,但是TCD对医生的专业性要求较高,临床普遍开展收到限制。头颅CT及MRI影像学检查近年来由于其灵敏度高、可重复等特点,通过评估脑水肿、脑中线结构移位等可间接诊断ICP增高[20-21]。虽然低剂量的辐射被证实是安全的,但是孕妇是普遍是拒绝CT检查的,另外MRI由于耗时长、检查花费高等问题,造成两者未能在临床上普及和开展。通过ONSD值变化规律可反应ICP增高的情况,近年来越来越多的证据支持ONSD检查可以为临床判定ICP增高提供参考依据[22-24]。由于经眼眶超声测量ONSD具有快速、廉价、无创、可重复性高等特点使其在临床普及更具有优势。

    视神经作为中枢神经系统的一部分,被硬膜鞘和含有脑脊液的蛛网膜下腔所包围。在眼球后方3 mm处,视神经仅被脂肪包围,而硬膜鞘在其脂肪包裹下是可膨胀的,特别是在脑脊液压力升高的情况下。所以由于这种特殊的构造,随着ICP的增高势必导致ONSD值增加[25]。本研究发现,ONSD值的ICP增高组比ICP正常组和对照组明显升高(P < 0.01),但是ICP正常组与对照组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),与利青等[26]测量了70例妊娠高血压疾病孕妇的结果一致。本研究的ICP增高组的ONSD值为(4.70±0.30)mm,较之前研究数值偏小,如2017年利青等[26]研究的结果为(5.80±0.40)mm,2020年渠晓旭等[22]研究结果为(5.30±0.69)mm。造成这种情况的原因一方面可能由于人群差异导致ICP增高情况不同,另一方面本研究中样本量较小在一定程度上可能会造成偏倚。本研究发现子痫前期孕妇ICP增高的ROC曲线为0.759,一定程度可以判断ONSD在诊断ICP增高具有临床意义。此外,研究发现当ONSD值是4.0 mm为子痫前期病人ICP增高的最佳阈值,与国内外研究中心对ONSD诊断ICP增高的临界值相符(4.00~6.00 mm),目前业内一直认为临界阈值取5.0 mm[27-29]。但ICP增高如果得不到及时处理,特别是重度子痫前期病人会出现严重的后果甚至导致死亡,所以关于ONSD诊断ICP的临界值研究支持 < 5.0 mm。目前国内外一直认为超声检查ONSD在临床诊断ICP增高是一种潜力的无创工具,但是对于ONSD用于诊断子痫前期孕产妇ICP增高情况的研究鲜有报道,本研究对诊断和治疗重度子痫前期ICP增高提供依据。

    本研究可能存在以下不足:(1)研究为蚌埠医学院第一附属医院单中心研究,样本量少,结果可能会有一定的偏倚;(2)本研究的研究对象为孕妇,所以未使用侵入性ICP监测,使用MRI间接判断ICP增高势必存在假阴性和假阳性的可能;(3)运用经眼眶超声测量ONSD是需要具有丰富经验的该专业的临床医生完成,具有较高的专业诉求,可能会在后期的临床普及上受到一定的限制。

    综上所述,本研究结果显示利用ONSD值对ICP增高的重度子痫孕妇的诊断具有可靠的灵敏度和特异度。超声监测ONSD与重度子痫前期ICP增高有良好的相关性,为以后此类病人的实时监测,降低ICP升高带来的风险,提供帮助。医生可以根据ONSD及数值的变化及时掌握子痫前期孕妇ICP增高的情况并及时做出应对策略,适合在医院妇产科推广和应用。

Reference (29)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return