放大内镜联合内镜智能分光比色技术对胃癌及癌前病变的诊断价值

郑雄; 孙颖; 胡梅洁; 李健; 刘进进; 马瑾; 王吉

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

放大内镜联合内镜智能分光比色技术对胃癌及癌前病变的诊断价值

郑雄 , 孙颖 , 胡梅洁 , 李健 , 刘进进 , 马瑾 , 王吉

文章导航 > 蚌埠医学院学报 > 2014, 39 > 12: (1641-1644)

引用本文:

Citation:

放大内镜联合内镜智能分光比色技术对胃癌及癌前病变的诊断价值

上海交通大学医学院瑞金医院卢湾分院消化科, 上海 200020

作者简介: 郑雄(1970-), 男, 硕士, 主任医师.

中图分类号: R735.2

The value of magnifying endoscopy combined with Fuji intelligent chromoendoscopy in the diagnosis of gastric cancer and precancerous lesions

Department of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital, Luwan Branch, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200020, China
CLC number: R735.2

摘要: 目的: 探讨放大内镜联合富士能电子分光内镜技术(FICE)对胃癌及癌前病变的诊断价值.方法: 收集消化内镜检查患者109例,共116处病灶,用放大内镜联合FICE技术及染色放大内镜观察胃黏膜腺管开口和微血管形态,将其分为6型(Ⅰ~Ⅲ型为胃黏膜腺管结构清晰,微血管形态分别为规则清晰、不规则、模糊不清;Ⅳ~Ⅵ型为胃黏膜腺管结构不规则模糊,微血管形态分别为规则清晰、不规则、模糊不清),并行活检组织学病理检查,将分型结合病理结果进行分析.结果: FICE放大内镜对腺管开口分型的诊断优于常规放大内镜(P< 0.01);FICE放大内镜与染色放大内镜图像相比,能更清晰显示胃黏膜微细血管形态结构(P< 0.01),两者在显示腺管开口方面差异无统计学意义(P >0.05).胃黏膜腺管开口规则清楚的病灶中(Ⅰ～Ⅲ型)均未发现癌变,仅有1例高级别内瘤变;高级别内瘤变及癌变均集中于胃黏膜腺管开口不规则模糊病灶中(Ⅳ～Ⅵ型).结论: 利用放大内镜联合FICE技术观察胃黏膜细微结构,能更加精确地引导活检,提高胃癌内镜诊断的准确性.
- 胃肿瘤 /
- 富士能电子分光内镜技术 /
- 放大内镜
Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the value of magnifying endoscopy combined with Fuji intelligent chromoendoscopy(FICE) in the diagnosis of gastric cancer and precancerous lesions.Methods: The gastric mucosa gland openings and microvascular morphology in 109 patients(116 lesions) were detected by magnifying endoscopy combined with FICE,all cases were divided into six types according to the examination result.The clear gastric mucosa gland,clear and regular or irregular and unclear microvascular pattern were the main manifestations of types Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ,the unclear and irregular gastric mucosa gland,clear and regular or irregular and unclear microvascular pattern were the main manifestations of types Ⅳ,Ⅴ and Ⅵ.The pathological results of different types were analyzed.Results: The type diagnosis of gastric mucosa gland using magnifying FICE was better than that using normal endoscope(P< 0.01).Compared with the magnifying chromoendoscopy,the magnifying FICE could clearly show the microvascular pattern(P< 0.01),the difference of the identifying the gastric mucosa gland opening between two methods was not statistically significant(P >0.05).Except for 1 HGD case,the canceration in case with clear and regular gastric mucosa gland opening(typeⅠto Ⅲ) was not found.The HGD and canceration located mainly in cases with unclear and irregular gastric mucosa gland opening(type Ⅳ to Ⅵ).Conclusions: Observing the microstructure of gastric lesions using magnifying FICE can guide the accurate biopsy,and improve the accuracy of diagnosing in gastric cancer.
- gastric neoplasms /
- Fuji intelligent chromoendoscopy /
- magnifying endoscopy

[1]	Mochizuki Y,Saito Y,Kobori A,et al.Magnifying endoscopy with Narrow-Band imaging in the differential diagnosis of gastric adenoma and carcinoma and identification of a simple indicator[J].J Gastrointestin Liver Dis,2012,21(4):383-390.
[2]	沈奕,钟捷,范荣.FICE技术应用于胃肠道病变的诊断[J].国际消化病杂志,2009,29(5): 305-307.
[3]	詹丽英,李志晋,胡俊,等.FICE放大内镜对慢性萎缩性胃炎的诊断[J].南昌大学学报:医学版,2012,52(11):56-59.
[4]	黄留业,刘运祥,吴承荣,等.FICE技术在大肠病变腺管开口分型及毛细血管形态观察中的价值[J].世界华人消化杂志,2008,16(26):2952-2958.
[5]	Sakaki N,Lida Y,Okazaki Y,et al.Magnifying endoscopic observation of gastric mucosa particularly in patients with atrophic gastritis[J].Endoscopy,1978,7(10):269-274.
[JP3]Tanaka K,Toyoda H,Kadowaki S,et al.Surface pattern classification by enhanced-magnification endoscopy for identifying early gastric cancers[J].Gastrointest Endosc,2008,67(3):430-437.
[7]	Yao K,Oishi T,Matsui T,et al.Novel magnified endoscopic findings of microvascular architecture in intramucosal gastric cancer[J].Gastrointes Endosc,2002,56(2):279-284.

[1]	徐林生 . 热活检钳联合圈套器辅助牵引在内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗胃肿瘤中的应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2020, 45(6): 795-798. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2020.06.026
[2]	朱玉 , 汪建超 , 邓敏 . 内镜全层切除术治疗胃固有肌层肿瘤的临床疗效观察. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2018, 43(7): 854-857. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2018.07.004
[3]	朱家磊 , 姜从桥 . 腹腔镜根治性远端胃切除两种消化系统重建的疗效分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2018, 43(4): 475-477. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2018.04.014
[4]	贾建光 , 李靖 , 李雷 , 姚廷敬 , 张晨嵩 , 钱军 . SiewertⅡ型和Ⅲ型食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜辅助近端胃切除和全胃切除疗效比较. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2019, 44(9): 1163-1165, 1169. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2019.09.006
[5]	芮军 , 顾荣民 , 李刚 . 胃镜活检诊断胃高级别上皮内瘤变22例临床分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2011, 36(2): 168-169.
[6]	韩晓鹏 , 许威 , 李正凯 , 陶瑞雨 , 余稳稳 , 于建平 , 李洪涛 , 刘宏斌 , 马小玲 . 不同消化道重建方式对腹腔镜胃癌术后反流的影响. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2019, 44(1): 26-27,28. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2019.01.007
[7]	杨帅帅 , 李海玲 , 崔景利 , 郭英英 , 赵春武 , 孙作成 . 纳米炭示踪剂在腹腔镜辅助近端进展期胃癌根治术中应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2017, 42(5): 637-640. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2017.05.023
[8]	曾国祥 , 黄文伟 , 黄修仿 . 腹腔镜辅助胃癌D2根治术的临床疗效及其对腹腔微转移的影响. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2018, 43(11): 1450-1452. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2018.11.016
[9]	郑雄 , 孙颖 , 胡梅洁 , 王吉 , 李健 . 超声内镜对胃癌术前TN分期的诊断价值. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2014, 39(11): 1531-1533.
[10]	林烈文 , 朱畅 , 潘凯 , 夏利刚 . 腹腔镜与开腹远端胃癌根治术的同期临床对比研究. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2011, 36(9): 953-955.
[11]	潘成武 , 李靖 , 谢波 , 张晨嵩 , 汪虎 , 马家驰 . 老年进展期胃癌病人腹腔镜手术方式的近期疗效对比. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2020, 45(9): 1197-1200. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2020.09.015
[12]	王小雷 , 高玉青 , 徐鹤 , 张书海 , 李淑华 , 赵灿灿 , 段绍峰 , 谢宗玉 . 基于能谱CT纹理分析在预测胃癌术前淋巴结转移中的价值. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2021, 46(1): 21-24. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2021.01.006
[13]	张磊 , 袁玉山 , 马培旗 , 彭彬 , 胡献阔 , 王震寰 . 低管电压联合模型迭代重建技术在胃癌CT增强中的应用价值. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2021, 46(9): 1244-1247. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2021.09.024
[14]	吴震峰 , 杨卫富 . 胃癌术后经鼻肠管早期肠内营养63例临床应用体会. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2009, 34(12): 1119-1120.
[15]	石向阳 , 杜四清 . 胃肠道高级别上皮内瘤变术后病理分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2012, 36(6): 674-675.
[16]	王姗 , 葛思堂 , 李娟 , 蔡艳 , 朱慧秀 . 益生菌对胃癌术后早期肠内营养不耐受的预防作用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2019, 44(7): 959-962. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2019.07.032
[17]	李靖 , 谢波 , 汪虎 , 马家驰 , 张晨嵩 , 潘成武 , 王庆康 , 贾建光 . 胃癌病人全胃切除术后早期经口营养与空肠营养管肠内营养的对比研究. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2021, 46(8): 1007-1010. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2021.08.005
[18]	季红敏 , 刘春芳 , 王姗 , 李亚军 , 张梦媛 , 刘璐璐 , 李秀川 . 双歧杆菌三联活菌联合序贯早期肠内营养对胃癌术后病人免疫炎症指标及体脂代谢水平的影响. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2023, 48(5): 664-668. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2023.05.026
[19]	祁真玉 , 于东红 , 汪向明 , 王骏 . 胃血管球瘤3例临床病理观察. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2016, 41(5): 613-615. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2016.05.019
[20]	曹玉根 , 林明 , 闾志坚 , 王克俭 . 胃癌根治术后早期联合肠内营养的应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2015, 40(8): 1042-1043. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2015.08.018

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 3761
HTML全文浏览量: 316
PDF下载量: 8
被引次数: 0

放大内镜联合内镜智能分光比色技术对胃癌及癌前病变的诊断价值

作者简介: 郑雄(1970-), 男, 硕士, 主任医师.

上海交通大学医学院瑞金医院卢湾分院消化科, 上海 200020

收稿日期: 2014-04-01

关键词:

摘要: 目的: 探讨放大内镜联合富士能电子分光内镜技术(FICE)对胃癌及癌前病变的诊断价值.方法: 收集消化内镜检查患者109例,共116处病灶,用放大内镜联合FICE技术及染色放大内镜观察胃黏膜腺管开口和微血管形态,将其分为6型(Ⅰ~Ⅲ型为胃黏膜腺管结构清晰,微血管形态分别为规则清晰、不规则、模糊不清;Ⅳ~Ⅵ型为胃黏膜腺管结构不规则模糊,微血管形态分别为规则清晰、不规则、模糊不清),并行活检组织学病理检查,将分型结合病理结果进行分析.结果: FICE放大内镜对腺管开口分型的诊断优于常规放大内镜(P< 0.01);FICE放大内镜与染色放大内镜图像相比,能更清晰显示胃黏膜微细血管形态结构(P< 0.01),两者在显示腺管开口方面差异无统计学意义(P >0.05).胃黏膜腺管开口规则清楚的病灶中(Ⅰ～Ⅲ型)均未发现癌变,仅有1例高级别内瘤变;高级别内瘤变及癌变均集中于胃黏膜腺管开口不规则模糊病灶中(Ⅳ～Ⅵ型).结论: 利用放大内镜联合FICE技术观察胃黏膜细微结构,能更加精确地引导活检,提高胃癌内镜诊断的准确性.

English Abstract

The value of magnifying endoscopy combined with Fuji intelligent chromoendoscopy in the diagnosis of gastric cancer and precancerous lesions

Department of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital, Luwan Branch, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200020, China

Received Date: 2014-04-01

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the value of magnifying endoscopy combined with Fuji intelligent chromoendoscopy(FICE) in the diagnosis of gastric cancer and precancerous lesions.Methods: The gastric mucosa gland openings and microvascular morphology in 109 patients(116 lesions) were detected by magnifying endoscopy combined with FICE,all cases were divided into six types according to the examination result.The clear gastric mucosa gland,clear and regular or irregular and unclear microvascular pattern were the main manifestations of types Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ,the unclear and irregular gastric mucosa gland,clear and regular or irregular and unclear microvascular pattern were the main manifestations of types Ⅳ,Ⅴ and Ⅵ.The pathological results of different types were analyzed.Results: The type diagnosis of gastric mucosa gland using magnifying FICE was better than that using normal endoscope(P< 0.01).Compared with the magnifying chromoendoscopy,the magnifying FICE could clearly show the microvascular pattern(P< 0.01),the difference of the identifying the gastric mucosa gland opening between two methods was not statistically significant(P >0.05).Except for 1 HGD case,the canceration in case with clear and regular gastric mucosa gland opening(typeⅠto Ⅲ) was not found.The HGD and canceration located mainly in cases with unclear and irregular gastric mucosa gland opening(type Ⅳ to Ⅵ).Conclusions: Observing the microstructure of gastric lesions using magnifying FICE can guide the accurate biopsy,and improve the accuracy of diagnosing in gastric cancer.