子宫瘢痕妊娠3种治疗方案疗效观察

张文慧; 李坚雄; 马黛

doi:10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2016.04.023

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

子宫瘢痕妊娠3种治疗方案疗效观察

张文慧 , 李坚雄 , 马黛

文章导航 > 蚌埠医学院学报 > 2016, 41 > 4: (496-498,501)

引用本文:

Citation:

子宫瘢痕妊娠3种治疗方案疗效观察

广东省深圳市龙岗区妇幼保健院妇产科, 518172

作者简介: 张文慧(1970-),女,副主任医师.

中图分类号: R714.22

The curative effect of three methods in the treatment of uterine scar pregnancy

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Longgang District Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Shenzhen Guangdong 518172, China
CLC number: R714.22

摘要: 目的:观察3种治疗方案治疗子宫瘢痕妊娠的疗效。方法:将120例子宫瘢痕妊娠患者随机分为3组,每组40例。甲氨蝶呤(MTX)组静脉注射MTX,栓塞组采用明胶海绵子宫动脉栓塞术,联合组子宫动脉灌注MTX联合子宫动脉栓塞术。比较3组β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素(β-hCG)恢复情况、出血总量、治疗7 d妊娠囊直径、住院时间、临床疗效和不良反应。结果:联合组治疗3 d、7 d后血清β-hCG水平均明显低于栓塞组和MTX组(P<0.01),出血总量显著少于栓塞组和MTX组(P<0.01),治疗7 d后妊娠囊直径均明显小于栓塞组和MTX组(P<0.01),β-hCG恢复正常时间及住院时间均显著短于栓塞组和MTX组(P<0.01)。3组患者临床疗效和不良反应差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:子宫动脉灌注MTX联合子宫动脉栓塞术治疗子宫瘢痕妊娠临床效果好,不良反应未增加。
- 子宫瘢痕妊娠 /
- 子宫动脉栓塞术 /
- 甲氨蝶呤
Abstract: Objective: To observe the curative effects of three methods in the treatment of uterine scar pregnancy(CSP). Methods: One hundred and twenty patients with CSP were randomly divided into the methotrexate(MTX) group, embolization group and combination group(40 cases each group). The MTX group, embolization group and combination group were treated with MTX intravenous injection, gelatin sponge perfusion in uterine artery and combination with the above two methods, respectively. The levels of β-human chorionic gonadotrophin(β-hCG), intraoperative and postoperative hemorrhage volume, diameter of gestational sac after 7 days of treatment, hospitalization time and clinical efficacy and adverse reactions among three groups were compared. Results: The serum levels of β-hCG in combination group after 3 days and 7 days of treatment were obviously lower than those in embolization group and MTX group(P<0.01). The total hemorrhage volume in the combination group was obviously less than that in embolization group and MTX group(P<0.01). The diameter of gestational sac after 7 days of treatment was significantly smaller than that in embolization group and MTX group(P<0.01). The time of β-hCG level recovery and hospitalization in combination group were obviously shorter than those in embolization group and MTX group(P<0.01). The differences of clinical curative effects and adverse reactions among three groups were not statistically significant(P>0.05). Conclusions: The treatment of uterine scar pregnancy with MTX perfusion combined with embolization in uterine artery has good clinical effects, and the adverse reactions do not be increased.
- uterine scar pregnancy /
- uterine artery embolization /
- methotrexate

[1]	邓娟红.疤痕子宫再次妊娠早期终止方法探讨[J].实用临床医药杂志,2013,17(3):61.
[2]	贾燕鸿,舒畅,崔丽峰,等.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠49例临床分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2014,29(33):5398.
[3]	王克芳,王菊荣,李斌.腹腔镜手术治疗剖宫产术后子宫疤痕部位妊娠[J].中国微创外科杂志,2011,11(6):496.
[4]	邵华江,吴映云.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的个体化治疗[J].现代实用医学,2014,26(3):246.
[5]	任彤,赵峻,万希润,等.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的诊断及处理[J].现代妇产科进展,2007,16(6):433.
[6]	赵勤,詹水仙.两种方法处理剖宫产术后子宫疤痕妊娠的疗效比较[J].中国妇幼保健,2014,29(7):1115.
[7]	张素仙,刘惠谨,杨晓玲,等.子宫动脉栓塞术治疗剖宫产术后子宫疤痕妊娠的临床分析[J].昆明医科大学学报,2012,33(9):97.
[8]	PENG P,GUI T,LIU X,et al.Comparative efficacy and safety of local and systemic methotrexate injection in cesarean scar pregnancy[J].Ther Clin Risk Manag,2015,11(1):137.
[9]	BRASIC N,WARDEN M,VARGAS JE.Conservative management of cesarean scar pregnancy with sonographically guided transvaginal methotrexate injection[J].J Ultrasound Med,2013,32(6):1061.
[10]	SADEGHI H,RUTHERFORD T,RACKOWB W,et al.Cesarcan sear ectopic pregnancy:ease series and review of the literature[J].Am J Perinatol,2010,27(2):111.
[11]	冯穗华,黄泳华,张群.子宫动脉栓塞术治疗剖宫产术后疤痕妊娠的应用分析[J].吉林医学,2012,33(21):4595.
[12]	张长虹,王晖.多种方法在治疗剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠中的应用[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2014,39(3):339.
[13]	柯雁飞,张桂丽,石华.子宫动脉栓塞和甲氨蝶呤注射在疤痕妊娠中的疗效[J].贵阳医学院学报,2013,38(5):535.
[14]	仵金华.子宫动脉栓塞术治疗剖宫产术后子宫疤痕妊娠的疗效观察[J].河南医学研究,2014,23(8):46.
[15]	吕华,章颖,袁桂兰,等.子宫动脉化疗栓塞结合清宫术在剖宫产瘢痕妊娠中的应用[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2013,21(6):400.
[16]	李建明,程学军,秦孝军,等.子宫动脉栓塞联合甲氨蝶呤灌注在瘢痕妊娠中的应用[J].内蒙古医科大学学报,2015,37(5):403.
[17]	WU X,ZHANG X,ZHU J,et al.Caesarean scar pregnancy:comparative efficacy and safety of treatment by uterine artery chemoembolization and systemic methotrexate injection[J].Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2012,161(1):75.

[1]	阮璐璐 . 超声介入引导下甲氨蝶呤局部注射联合口服米非司酮治疗子宫瘢痕妊娠的疗效观察. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2019, 44(9): 1230-1233. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2019.09.024
[2]	王剑 , 施万印 , 高立兵 , 顾金林 , 方世月 , 张宏 , 刘亮 . 子宫动脉化疗栓塞治疗子宫瘢痕妊娠合并大出血13例. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2013, 37(12): 1642-1644.
[3]	徐郑军 , 刘永莹 , 张晓平 , 刘克杰 . 阴式子宫瘢痕妊娠病灶切除+子宫憩室修补术与子宫动脉栓塞术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的疗效比较. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2016, 41(7): 874-876. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2016.07.011
[4]	李跃波 , 周颖 , 申震 , 吴大保 . 子宫动脉栓塞后清宫治疗内生型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2018, 43(12): 1572-1574. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2018.12.009
[5]	屈晓洁 , 于申 . 子宫动脉栓塞术与局灶切除术治疗子宫腺肌病临床分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2015, 40(9): 1199-1201. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2015.09.019
[6]	丁静 , 谢书琼 , 李英 . 子宫动脉栓塞介入治疗子宫肌瘤临床疗效分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2014, 39(8): 1046-1048.
[7]	张长虹 , 王晖 . 多种方法在治疗剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠中的应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2014, 38(3): 339-342.
[8]	何玉 , 王才智 , 林路 . 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠11例分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2009, 34(11): 981-983.
[9]	金涛 , 江谋应 , 徐万里 , 王金林 . 经子宫动脉介入治疗输卵管妊娠27例. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2010, 35(3): 292-294.
[10]	曲珣 . 子宫颈妊娠15例临床分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2011, 36(9): 1002-1003.
[11]	郑家雷 , 方向 , 汪子书 . 大剂量甲氨蝶呤、顺铂联合阿霉素新辅助化疗骨肉瘤的近期疗效分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2015, 40(12): 1631-1634. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2015.12.005
[12]	麻璨琛 . 白芍总苷联合甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿关节炎疗效的Meta分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2016, 41(3): 329-332. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2016.03.016
[13]	姚茹冰 , 高佩芳 , 蔡辉 . 甲氨蝶呤对类风湿关节炎CCP/AST分泌白介素-4及干扰素-γ水平的影响. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2011, 36(1): 49-51.
[14]	向君华 . 大剂量甲氨蝶呤治疗儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病的不良反应临床观察. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2015, 40(5): 616-618. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2015.05.018
[15]	彭程 , 周颖 , 张雪芬 , 吴大保 . EMP化疗方案在治疗妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤中的临床价值. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2017, 42(6): 784-786. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2017.06.028
[16]	方向东 . 介入治疗产后出血5例分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2006, 31(1): 58-59.
[17]	范建灵 , 张宁芝 , 肖红 , 梅莉 , 苏果 . 早期子宫瘢痕妊娠5例临床分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2010, 35(3): 284-285.
[18]	王剑南 . 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕处妊娠9例临床分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2008, 33(4): 463-464.
[19]	黄娟 . 子宫瘢痕部妊娠4例诊治分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2013, 37(1): 79-80.
[20]	方红 , 宋影 . 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠15例临床分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2013, 37(4): 438-439.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 3985
HTML全文浏览量: 515
PDF下载量: 152
被引次数: 0

子宫瘢痕妊娠3种治疗方案疗效观察

作者简介: 张文慧(1970-),女,副主任医师.

广东省深圳市龙岗区妇幼保健院妇产科, 518172

收稿日期: 2015-03-20

关键词:

摘要: 目的:观察3种治疗方案治疗子宫瘢痕妊娠的疗效。方法:将120例子宫瘢痕妊娠患者随机分为3组,每组40例。甲氨蝶呤(MTX)组静脉注射MTX,栓塞组采用明胶海绵子宫动脉栓塞术,联合组子宫动脉灌注MTX联合子宫动脉栓塞术。比较3组β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素(β-hCG)恢复情况、出血总量、治疗7 d妊娠囊直径、住院时间、临床疗效和不良反应。结果:联合组治疗3 d、7 d后血清β-hCG水平均明显低于栓塞组和MTX组(P<0.01),出血总量显著少于栓塞组和MTX组(P<0.01),治疗7 d后妊娠囊直径均明显小于栓塞组和MTX组(P<0.01),β-hCG恢复正常时间及住院时间均显著短于栓塞组和MTX组(P<0.01)。3组患者临床疗效和不良反应差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:子宫动脉灌注MTX联合子宫动脉栓塞术治疗子宫瘢痕妊娠临床效果好,不良反应未增加。

English Abstract

The curative effect of three methods in the treatment of uterine scar pregnancy

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Longgang District Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Shenzhen Guangdong 518172, China

Received Date: 2015-03-20

Abstract: Objective: To observe the curative effects of three methods in the treatment of uterine scar pregnancy(CSP). Methods: One hundred and twenty patients with CSP were randomly divided into the methotrexate(MTX) group, embolization group and combination group(40 cases each group). The MTX group, embolization group and combination group were treated with MTX intravenous injection, gelatin sponge perfusion in uterine artery and combination with the above two methods, respectively. The levels of β-human chorionic gonadotrophin(β-hCG), intraoperative and postoperative hemorrhage volume, diameter of gestational sac after 7 days of treatment, hospitalization time and clinical efficacy and adverse reactions among three groups were compared. Results: The serum levels of β-hCG in combination group after 3 days and 7 days of treatment were obviously lower than those in embolization group and MTX group(P<0.01). The total hemorrhage volume in the combination group was obviously less than that in embolization group and MTX group(P<0.01). The diameter of gestational sac after 7 days of treatment was significantly smaller than that in embolization group and MTX group(P<0.01). The time of β-hCG level recovery and hospitalization in combination group were obviously shorter than those in embolization group and MTX group(P<0.01). The differences of clinical curative effects and adverse reactions among three groups were not statistically significant(P>0.05). Conclusions: The treatment of uterine scar pregnancy with MTX perfusion combined with embolization in uterine artery has good clinical effects, and the adverse reactions do not be increased.