CA153、CEA与细针吸取细胞学联合检测在乳腺癌诊断中的价值

孙磊; 张守永; 广圣芳; 刘选仁; 王璐; 翟志敏

doi:10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2018.03.033

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

CA153、CEA与细针吸取细胞学联合检测在乳腺癌诊断中的价值

孙磊 , 张守永 , 广圣芳 , 刘选仁 , 王璐 , 翟志敏

文章导航 > 蚌埠医学院学报 > 2018, 43 > 3: (391-393)

引用本文:

Citation:

CA153、CEA与细针吸取细胞学联合检测在乳腺癌诊断中的价值

1. 安徽省六安市人民医院, 安徽医科大学附属六安医院检验科, 237006;
2. 安徽医科大学第二附属医院血液内科, 安徽合肥 230061

作者简介: 孙磊(1984-),男,硕士研究生,主管检验师.

通讯作者: 翟志敏, 教授.zzzm889@163.com

中图分类号: R737.9

Clinical value of the detection of CA153 and CEA combined with fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of breast cancer

1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Anhui Lu'an People's Hospital, Lu'an Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Lu'an Anhui 237006;
2. Department of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei Anhui 230061, China

Corresponding author: ZHAI Zhi-min, 教授.zzzm889@163.com

CLC number: R737.9

摘要: 目的：探讨血清糖类抗原（CA）153、癌胚抗原（CEA）和细针吸取细胞学（FNAC）联合检测在乳腺癌诊断中的价值。方法：选取67例乳腺癌病人和32例乳腺良性疾病病人，分别做血清CA153、CEA和FNAC检测，分析3项指标联合检测对乳腺癌的诊断价值。结果：CA153 检测的敏感性为8.96%，特异性为100.00%，准确性为38.38%；CEA敏感性16.42%，特异性96.88%，准确性为43.43%；FNAC的敏感性为83.58%，特异性为100.00%，准确性为88.89%；3项联检敏感性提高到88.06%，准确性提高到90.91%，特异性也达到了96.88%。FNAC、CA153、CEA单项检测诊断乳腺癌的曲线下面积（AUC）分别为0.910、0.709和0.705，3项联合诊断的AUC（0.942）高于单项指标AUC。结论：CA153、CEA和FNAC联合检测可以提高乳腺癌诊断的灵敏度和准确性，对乳腺癌的早期诊断有着较高的参考价值。
- 乳腺肿瘤 /
- 细针吸取细胞学 /
- 糖类抗原153 /
- 癌胚抗原
Abstract: Objective:To investigate the value of the detection of serum carbohydrate antigen(CA) 153 and carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA) combined with fine needle aspiration cytology(FNAC) in the diagnosis of breast cancer.Methods:The serum levels of CA153,CEA,and FNAC in 67 patients with breast cancer and 32 patients with benign breast disease were detected.The values of the combined detection of CA 153,CEA and FNAC in the diagnosis of breast cancer were analyzed.Results:The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of CA153 examination were 8.96%,100.00% and 38.38%,respectively.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of CEA examination was 16.42%,96.88% and 43.43%,respectively.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of FNAC examination were 83.58%,100.00%and 88.89%,respectively.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of three combined inspection were 88.06%,90.91% and 96.88%,respectively.The AUC values of CA 153,CEA and FNAC in the diagnosis of breast cancer were 0.910,0.709 and 0.705,respectively,and the AUC value of combined detection(0.942) was significantly higher than that of any signal marker.Conclusions:The combined detection of CA153,CEA and FNAC can improve the sensitivity and accuracy in the diagnosis of breast cancer,which has a high reference value in the early diagnosis of breast cancer.
- breast neoplasms /
- fine needle aspiration cytology /
- carbohydrate antigen 153 /
- carcinoembryonic antigen

[1]	DESANTIS CE,FEDEWA SA,GODING SA,et al.Breast cancer statistics,2015:convergence of incidence rates between black and white women[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2016,66(1):31.
[2]	CHEN W,ZHENG R,BAADE PD,et al.Cancer statistics in China,2015[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2016,66(2):115.
[3]	谷学军,秦望森,许金玲.糖链抗原125、153联合检测在乳腺恶性肿瘤诊断中的价值[J].中国老年学杂志,2012,32(19):4176.
[4]	YIN LK,SUN XQ.Value of combined detection of serum CEA,CA72-4,CA19-9 and TSGF in the diagnosis of gastric cancer[J].Asian Pac J Cancer Prev,2015,16(9):3867.
[5]	ZHAO W,YU H,HAN Z,et al.Clinical significance of joint detection of serum CEA,SCCA,and bFGF in the diagnosis of lung cancer[J].Int J Clin Exp Pathol,2015,8(8):9506.
[6]	FU Y.Assessing clinical significance of serum CA15-3 and carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA) levels in breast cancer patients:a meta-analysis[J].Med Sci Monit,2016,22:3154.
[7]	祁洁,邹士涛,李晓庆.血清癌胚抗原、糖链抗原153与异常糖链糖蛋白在乳腺癌诊断中的应用[J].临床与病理杂志,2017,37(6):1211.
[8]	钟颖,孙强,黄汉源,等.乳腺癌细针穿刺活检的临床应用价值[J].中国癌症杂志,2013,23(11):926.
[9]	李继广,任更朴,蔡庆岭.CA153、CA125与细针吸取细胞学联检在乳腺癌诊断中的应用价值[J].中国实用医刊,2011,38(2):1.
[10]	AKER F,GVMRVKÇV G,ONOMAY BÇ,et al.Accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of breast cancer a single-center retrospective study from Turkey with cytohistological correlation in 733 cases[J].Diagn Cytopathol,2015,43(12):978.

[1]	王祖义 , 汪国文 , 刘学刚 , 唐震 , 史向前 , 李小军 , 刘以尧 , 段贵新 , 周晓 , 贡会源 . 非小细胞肺癌外周血癌胚抗原mRNA表达与肿瘤微血管密度的相关性. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2009, 34(2): 100-102.
[2]	孙丽芳 , 陈余清 , 赵成岭 , 李伟 , 李殿明 . 生存素基因联合细胞角蛋白19片段抗原及癌胚抗原检测对肺癌引起胸腔积液的诊断意义. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2010, 35(10): 993-995.
[3]	戴素俊 , 施明美 , 胡江 , 夏峰 . 腺苷脱氨酶、C-反应蛋白与癌胚抗原检测对胸腔积液的诊断价值. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2006, 31(4): 422-423.
[4]	谢坤杰 . 肿瘤标志物联合检测诊断乳腺癌58例. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2013, 37(8): 1028-1029.
[5]	廖洪宇 , 龚建 . 血清CA15-3、CA125、CEA和PRL水平与乳腺癌及骨转移的关系. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2014, 39(10): 1418-1420.
[6]	沈中一 . 乳腺癌患者血清癌抗原153与恶性肿瘤特异性生长因子的检测分析. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2012, 36(2): 198-199.
[7]	傅晓艳 . 乳腺癌Ki-67抗原表达与腋淋巴结转移和组织学分级的关系. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2005, 30(1): 17-19.
[8]	李晓广 . 血清前列腺特异性抗原在乳腺癌诊断中的应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2005, 30(6): 546-548.
[9]	许华斌 . 血清肿瘤标志物联合检测在肺癌诊断中的应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2014, 39(8): 1113-1116.
[10]	张成斌 , 周少波 , 邵明 , 郑兆炜 , 闻静 . 色素内镜联合肿瘤标志物检测在早期结直肠癌诊断中的应用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2018, 43(1): 23-26. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2018.01.007
[11]	徐伟刚 , 胡梅齐 , 陆群 . 血清TSGF、CEA、CA242、CA19-9联合检测对消化道恶性肿瘤的诊断价值. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2004, 29(2): 132-134.
[12]	郭晖 , 丁淑琴 , 郑晶 , 耿建 . 外周血中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比值、血小板淋巴细胞比值、CEA和AFP在原发性肝癌辅助诊断中的临床价值. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2022, 47(2): 223-226. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2022.02.022
[13]	梁翠微 , 龚五星 , 杜均祥 , 彭东旭 . 非小细胞肺癌外周血分子微转移研究. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2011, 36(7): 709-711.
[14]	刘臣彪 , 陈昌杰 , 章尧 , 章菊 , 杨清玲 , 王惠 . 葡萄籽提取物抑制乳腺癌细胞生长的实验研究. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2009, 34(4): 277-280.
[15]	李艳 , 崔珍 , 李玲玲 , 王效静 , 李多杰 . 乳腺癌病人循环肿瘤细胞检测的临床意义. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2017, 42(10): 1318-1320,1323. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2017.10.007
[16]	何晓东 , 顾素英 . 乳腺癌影像学检查技术进展. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2010, 35(4): 429-431.
[17]	王腾 , 张晖 . KRT81在乳腺癌组织中的表达及其调控AKT/mTOR通路影响糖代谢抑制乳腺癌细胞增殖的作用. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2023, 48(11): 1488-1494. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2023.11.002
[18]	付晓艳 , 秦锡虎 , 陈同珏 , 谈敏 . 新辅助化疗对乳腺癌细胞凋亡和增殖的影响. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2006, 31(6): 624-626.
[19]	陈昌杰 , 章菊 , 杨清玲 . 靶向TrKA基因的SiRNA干扰对乳腺癌细胞生长的影响. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2008, 33(6): 677-680.
[20]	刘菊梅 , 刘运贤 . 乳腺肿块冷冻切片与细胞印片同步应用体会. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2009, 34(6): 522-522.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 3614
HTML全文浏览量: 568
PDF下载量: 69
被引次数: 0

CA153、CEA与细针吸取细胞学联合检测在乳腺癌诊断中的价值

通讯作者: 翟志敏, 教授.zzzm889@163.com

作者简介: 孙磊(1984-),男,硕士研究生,主管检验师.

1. 安徽省六安市人民医院, 安徽医科大学附属六安医院检验科, 237006;
2. 安徽医科大学第二附属医院血液内科, 安徽合肥 230061

收稿日期: 2017-11-24
录用日期: 2018-01-28

关键词:

摘要: 目的：探讨血清糖类抗原（CA）153、癌胚抗原（CEA）和细针吸取细胞学（FNAC）联合检测在乳腺癌诊断中的价值。方法：选取67例乳腺癌病人和32例乳腺良性疾病病人，分别做血清CA153、CEA和FNAC检测，分析3项指标联合检测对乳腺癌的诊断价值。结果：CA153 检测的敏感性为8.96%，特异性为100.00%，准确性为38.38%；CEA敏感性16.42%，特异性96.88%，准确性为43.43%；FNAC的敏感性为83.58%，特异性为100.00%，准确性为88.89%；3项联检敏感性提高到88.06%，准确性提高到90.91%，特异性也达到了96.88%。FNAC、CA153、CEA单项检测诊断乳腺癌的曲线下面积（AUC）分别为0.910、0.709和0.705，3项联合诊断的AUC（0.942）高于单项指标AUC。结论：CA153、CEA和FNAC联合检测可以提高乳腺癌诊断的灵敏度和准确性，对乳腺癌的早期诊断有着较高的参考价值。

English Abstract

Clinical value of the detection of CA153 and CEA combined with fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of breast cancer

Corresponding author: ZHAI Zhi-min, 教授.zzzm889@163.com

1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Anhui Lu'an People's Hospital, Lu'an Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Lu'an Anhui 237006;
2. Department of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei Anhui 230061, China

Received Date: 2017-11-24
Accepted Date: 2018-01-28

Abstract: Objective:To investigate the value of the detection of serum carbohydrate antigen(CA) 153 and carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA) combined with fine needle aspiration cytology(FNAC) in the diagnosis of breast cancer.Methods:The serum levels of CA153,CEA,and FNAC in 67 patients with breast cancer and 32 patients with benign breast disease were detected.The values of the combined detection of CA 153,CEA and FNAC in the diagnosis of breast cancer were analyzed.Results:The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of CA153 examination were 8.96%,100.00% and 38.38%,respectively.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of CEA examination was 16.42%,96.88% and 43.43%,respectively.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of FNAC examination were 83.58%,100.00%and 88.89%,respectively.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of three combined inspection were 88.06%,90.91% and 96.88%,respectively.The AUC values of CA 153,CEA and FNAC in the diagnosis of breast cancer were 0.910,0.709 and 0.705,respectively,and the AUC value of combined detection(0.942) was significantly higher than that of any signal marker.Conclusions:The combined detection of CA153,CEA and FNAC can improve the sensitivity and accuracy in the diagnosis of breast cancer,which has a high reference value in the early diagnosis of breast cancer.