-
近年来,标准化病人(standardized patient,SP)在结构化医学教育中发挥着重要作用,越来越多的医学学科将其应用在实际临床教学中以提高医学生的临床技能[1]。其中,教师标准化病人(teachers standardized patient,TSP)是由具有丰富经验的临床教师,经过系统、标准的专科培训后,模拟SP而参与教学[2]。客观结构化临床考试(objective structured clinical examination,OSCE)是一种新兴的医学考核形式,通过设置逼真的临床情境并结合SP,从而对医学生的专业技能进行综合考核[3]。创伤骨科学因其学科特殊性,通常要求医学生具备较高的临床思维和动手能力。而传统的教学模式往往偏重理论输入,无法达到预期的教学效果。本研究将TSP教学与OSCE相结合应用于骨科规范化培训带教中,评价其教学质量及效果。现作报道。
-
观察组学生理论成绩总分明显高于对照组(P < 0.01),2组学生基本知识考核成绩差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),观察组学生病例分析成绩明显高于对照组(P < 0.01)(见表 1)。
分组 n 基本知识 病例分析 总成绩 病史采集 病情分析 诊断及鉴别诊断 治疗方案拟定 合计 观察组 41 36.09±3.44 13.35±1.15 14.34±0.85 14.46±0.71 14.12±0.92 56.26±1.93 92.36±3.54 对照组 44 35.36±3.46 8.45±2.46 7.56±2.28 9.38±3.12 8.11±2.32 33.52±7.58 68.88±8.59 t — 0.98 11.84 18.32 10.48 15.84 19.23 16.26 P — > 0.05 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 表 1 2组学生理论成绩比较(x±s;分)
-
观察组学生在体格检查、骨牵引制动、复位石膏固定方面的考核成绩均明显高于对照组(P < 0.01)(见表 2)。
分组 n 体格检查 骨牵引制动 复位石膏固定 观察组 41 94.46±2.24 95.34±1.37 95.59±1.25 对照组 44 86.81±3.89 86.25±3.15 88.14±3.19 t — 10.96 12.93 10.78 P — < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 表 2 2组学生技能成绩比较(x±s;分)
-
观察组学生在提高学习兴趣、解决问题能力、沟通能力、团队协作能力、教学互动、自学能力方面的教学满意度均明显高于对照组(P < 0.01)(见表 3)。
分组 n 学习兴趣 解决问题 沟通能力 团队协作 教学互动 自学能力 满意 不满意 满意 不满意 满意 不满意 满意 不满意 满意 不满意 满意 不满意 观察组 41 39(95.1) 2(4.9) 40(97.6) 1(2.4) 38(92.7) 3(7.3) 38(92.7) 3(7.3) 37(90.2) 4(9.8) 35(85.4) 6(14.6) 对照组 44 24(54.5) 20(45.5) 19(43.2) 25(56.9) 23(52.3) 21(47.7) 21(47.7) 23(52.3) 18(40.9) 26(59.1) 20(45.5) 24(54.5) χ2 — 18.22 29.56 17.10 20.20 22.62 14.80 P — < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 表 3 2组教学满意度比较[n;百分率(%)]
TSP联合OSCE教学模式在创伤骨科学规范化培训中的应用效果评价
Evaluation of the application effect of TSP combined with OSCE teaching mode in standardized training of trauma osteology
-
摘要:
目的研究教师模拟标准化病人(TSP)联合临床医师技能培训考试系统(OSCE)教学模式创伤骨科学规范化培训中的应用效果。 方法选取85名住院医师规范化培训学生,根据随机数字法分为观察组41名和对照组44名。观察组实施TSP结合OSCE教学模式,对照组实施传统教学模式。比较2组学生理论考核成绩、临床技能考核成绩和教学满意度。 结果观察组学生理论成绩总分明显高于对照组(P < 0.01),2组学生基本知识考核成绩差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),观察组学生病例分析成绩明显高于对照组(P < 0.01)。观察组学生在体格检查、骨牵引制动、复位石膏固定方面的考核成绩均明显高于对照组(P < 0.01)。观察组学生在提高学习兴趣、解决问题能力、沟通能力、团队协作能力、教学互动、自学能力方面的教学满意度均明显高于对照组(P < 0.01)。 结论在创伤骨科学规范化培训中引入TSP联合OSCE教学模式,能显著提高学生的病例分析能力及临床动手能力,有助于提高教学质量。 Abstract:ObjectiveTo explore the application effect of teachers standardized patient (TSP) combined with objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) teaching mode in the standardized training of trauma osteology. MethodsA total of 85 students of resident standardized training were selected and divided into observation group(n=41) and control group(n=44) according to random number method.The observation group implemented TSP combined with OSCE teaching mode, while the control group implemented traditional teaching mode.The theoretical examination results, clinical skill examination results and teaching satisfaction of the two groups were compared. ResultsThe total theoretical examination score of students in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.01), there was no significant difference in basic knowledge examination results between the two groups (P>0.05), and the case analysis results of students in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.01).The results of physical examination, bone traction and immobilization, reduction and plaster fixation in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.01).The teaching satisfaction of students in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group in improving their learning interest, problem-solving ability, communication ability, teamwork ability, teaching interaction and self-learning ability (P < 0.01). ConclusionsThe introduction of TSP combined with OSCE teaching mode in the standardized training of trauma osteology can significantly improve the case analysis ability and clinical practice ability of students, and is helpful to improve the teaching quality. -
表 1 2组学生理论成绩比较(x±s;分)
分组 n 基本知识 病例分析 总成绩 病史采集 病情分析 诊断及鉴别诊断 治疗方案拟定 合计 观察组 41 36.09±3.44 13.35±1.15 14.34±0.85 14.46±0.71 14.12±0.92 56.26±1.93 92.36±3.54 对照组 44 35.36±3.46 8.45±2.46 7.56±2.28 9.38±3.12 8.11±2.32 33.52±7.58 68.88±8.59 t — 0.98 11.84 18.32 10.48 15.84 19.23 16.26 P — > 0.05 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 表 2 2组学生技能成绩比较(x±s;分)
分组 n 体格检查 骨牵引制动 复位石膏固定 观察组 41 94.46±2.24 95.34±1.37 95.59±1.25 对照组 44 86.81±3.89 86.25±3.15 88.14±3.19 t — 10.96 12.93 10.78 P — < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 表 3 2组教学满意度比较[n;百分率(%)]
分组 n 学习兴趣 解决问题 沟通能力 团队协作 教学互动 自学能力 满意 不满意 满意 不满意 满意 不满意 满意 不满意 满意 不满意 满意 不满意 观察组 41 39(95.1) 2(4.9) 40(97.6) 1(2.4) 38(92.7) 3(7.3) 38(92.7) 3(7.3) 37(90.2) 4(9.8) 35(85.4) 6(14.6) 对照组 44 24(54.5) 20(45.5) 19(43.2) 25(56.9) 23(52.3) 21(47.7) 21(47.7) 23(52.3) 18(40.9) 26(59.1) 20(45.5) 24(54.5) χ2 — 18.22 29.56 17.10 20.20 22.62 14.80 P — < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 -
[1] 张媛媛, 朱明玥, 高冬梅, 等. 教师标准化病人在妇产科教学实践中的应用[J]. 中国医药导报, 2018, 15(1): 145. [2] 刁兴华, 张向卉, 翟清亮, 等. PBL联合TSP教学法在妇产科实习生医患沟通教学中的应用[J]. 继续医学教育, 2021, 35(3): 11. [3] SIDDHARTHAN T, SOARES S, WANG HH, et al. Objective structured clinical examination-based teaching of the musculoskeletal examination[J]. South Med J, 2017, 110(12): 761. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000739 [4] 张弛, 刘松, 王钊, 等. 数字骨科技术在骨科住院医师规范化培训中的应用[J]. 卫生职业教育, 2020, 38(9): 148. [5] 凌利, 施素华, 马少平. 情景模拟+教师标准化病人在医师培训中的应用[J]. 继续医学教育, 2020, 34(3): 18. [6] STUMBAR SE, GARBA NA, STEVENS M, et al. Using a hybrid lecture and small-group standardized patient case to teach the inclusive sexual history and transgender patient care[J]. South Med J, 2021, 114(1): 17. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001197 [7] 叶胜, 戴礼鸣, 张玲, 等. TSP教学法在医学生医患沟通能力培训中的应用研究[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2019, 1(14): 23. [8] 叶国柳, 杜丹丽, 靳丽杰, 等. SP结合CBL教学模式在妇产科住院医师规范化培训中的应用[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2018(5): 661. [9] DENG B, FENN NE, PLAKE KS. Impact of a teaching objective structured clinical examination (TOSCE) on student confidence in a pharmacy skills laboratory[J]. Curr Pharm Teach Learn, 2019, 11(2): 145. [10] SACEDA-CORRALO D, FONDA-PASCUAL P, MORENO-ARRONES ÓM, et al. Objective structured clinical examination as an assessment tool for clinical skills in dermatology[J]. Actas Dermosifiliogr, 2017, 108(3): 237. [11] YU J, LEE S, KIM M, et al. Comparison of students' performance of objective structured clinical examination during clinical practice[J]. Korean J Med Educ, 2020, 32(3): 231.